Mahershala Ali’s New GQ Profile Describes Him as ‘Vivid and Dashing’ and Fans Agree

Mahershala Ali said he was mistaken for a terrorist post-9/11. (Peggy Sirota/GQ)

Actor Mahershala Ali is being celebrated for his appearance on GQ’s newest issue, which hails the Muslim star as a “great American.”

Ali’s star has risen as he went from being known as a supporting character on “House of Cards” to an Oscar winner for his turn in “Moonlight.” As a result, fans have been ogling his new photo spread, hailing it as a political moment and applauding his charming good looks — which GQ described as “vivid and dashing.”

The symbolism of a Muslim actor, who was targeted post-9/11 as a terrorist, wasn’t lost on one Twitter user.

https://twitter.com/Mark_A_Green/status/876793894981083136

Many more simply were in awe of his beauty.

https://twitter.com/ethiopienne/status/876790309132414976

https://twitter.com/LadyOnTheMuna2/status/876776076709580801

https://twitter.com/kristinamonllos/status/876772357263822848

https://twitter.com/hunteryharris/status/876778274868932608

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top