Reviews Mixed On Tupac Biopic; Some Loved It, But Jada Pinkett Smith, 50 Cent Were Not Among Them

“All Eyez On Me” has a 27-percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes. (Summit Entertainment)

The reviews are in for the highly anticipated Tupac Shakur biopic “All Eyez On Me” and the consensus is mixed.

The film, out now, stars newcomer Demetrius Shipp Jr. as the late icon and follows him throughout his life, career and death. Directed by Benny Boom, it also features Jamal Woolard as Biggie Smalls and Kat Graham as Jada Pinkett Smith. Smith, who was close friends with Pac, took to Twitter Friday, June 16, to clear up what she said were false depictions of her relationship with the rapper.

50 Cent also weighed in on the film, posting on Instagram that fans were better off watching the movie on the Amazon Fire Stick rather than seeing it in theaters.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BVZvGOgFrgl/

Others had similar reactions.

https://twitter.com/Jadaraynedrop/status/875751632000229378

But some applauded the film, especially Shipp’s performance.

https://twitter.com/chrislacy90/status/875719539710971905

https://twitter.com/tyler_santoro/status/875692788624568320

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top