Study: Instagram Detrimental to Young People’s Mental Health

Instagram most negatively impacted young users’ sleep and body image. (Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto/Getty Images)

A new report says Instagram is the most detrimental to young people’s minds, with Snapchat coming close behind.

UK-based Royal Society for Public Health’s Young Health Movement released the study, called #StatusofMind, Friday, May 19, which surveyed the social media habits of 1,500 people ages 14-24.

The study said potential negative effects of using social media include anxiety and depression — the latter of which 80,000 UK youth suffer from — body image issues and the fear of missing out, also known as FOMO. Instagram included all these markers, including loneliness, bullying and poor sleep, on which Snapchat had nearly the same negative impact.

“[Social media] resulted in me not eating properly and losing a lot of weight and
becoming very depressed,” an anonymous social media user wrote in the report. “I finally recovered, which was hard for myself to be bullied online again in year 8.”

To counteract these issues, RSPH calls for a “pop-up ‘heavy usage’ warning” on social media websites to limit the time spent on them (as the study shows that more than two hours of use can lead to poor self-rating of mental health), notifications that an image has been edited and more research on the websites’ effects.

Not all social media had negative outcomes, however. YouTube is the most positive social media platform, followed by Twitter and Facebook; these websites fostered emotional support, community building and self-expression.

“Social media allows me to post and express myself in a way I can’t do in everyday life,” an anonymous user wrote in the study. “I can use it as a place to vent my feelings when I have no one to talk to.”

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top