Study: Book Readers Tend to be Nicer, More Empathetic People Than TV Watchers

Readers of drama and romance novels tend to be more empathetic, according to a University of Kingston study. (Photo by Hero Images/Digital Vision/Getty Images).

If you needed a reason to pick up a new book or finally finish the one you started years ago, here’s one: Reading regularly might actually make you kinder.

A new study out of Kingston University in London suggests that people who prefer books over television are more likely to act in a “socially acceptable manner,” The Independent reported. Of the 123 participants quizzed on their book, TV and play preferences, those who read were more apt to consider other people’s feelings before their own.

On the flip side, avid TV (and Netflix) watchers were seemingly less friendly and less accepting of other people’s views or ideas.

There’s a catch, however, as sticking your nose in just any book won’t make you nicer.

The study found that fans of fiction displayed more positive social behaviors, while readers of romance and drama novels were the most empathetic. Moreover, lovers of experimental literature were better able to view things from different perspectives and readers who liked comedy were best at relating to others, according to the study.

Researchers announced their findings in front of the British Psychological Society last week, declaring that “exposure to fiction relates to a range of empathetic abilities.”

“Engaging with fictional prose and comedy in particular could be key to enhancing people’s empathetic abilities,” they said.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top