Chilli Responds to Backlash Hurled at Her After Proclaiming ‘All Lives Matter’

Rozonda “Chilli” Thomas (@therealchilli Instagram)

TLC’s Rozonda “Chilli” Thomas was the center of controversy after she said “All lives matter,” and now she’s explaining what she meant.

Thomas recently responded to a question about her participation in the Black Lives Matter movement on the UK’s Channel 4 News by saying, “All lives matter because there’s a time when different groups are targeted for different things.

“I just think that just the whole … even with the police brutality against these young Black boys and stuff like that and, all of that kind of stuff is wrong,” she said. “Even if it was a Caucasian teen kid this was happening to, it’s just not right.”

Two days after the interview, Chilli clarified her comments, saying she realizes the importance of BLM.

“Of course Black lives matter and the killing of young Black boys is heartbreaking to all of us,” she said in a statement to The Shade Room Thursday, May 11. “Everyone knows I am a Black mother of a Black son, so there is no way I could watch what’s happening and not be affected.

“That video was from an interview in London asking me about issues happening in the U.S. My response was inclusive of everyone but not meant to undervalue the Black Lives Matter movement or to suggest police brutality against Blacks is acceptable.”

Twitter users weren’t satisfied by Chilli’s statement.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top