Diddy’s Ex-Chef Files Lawsuit Alleging Sexual Harassment, Wage Violations; Rep Dismisses Claims

Sean “Diddy” Combs allegedly asked his former chef if she liked his naked body. (John Lamparski/WireImage/Getty Images)

A chef formerly employed by Sean “Diddy” Combs has filed a lawsuit alleging sexual harassment, a charge deemed “frivolous” by his representatives.

Cindy Rueda claims Diddy “regularly summoned” her to prepare meals for him and his guests while Diddy and his visitors “were engaged in or immediately following sexual activity.”

The suit was filed Monday, May 8, in the Los Angeles Superior Court and counts Diddy and Combs Enterprises among its defendants. It seeks unspecified damages.

It also alleges Rueda was called upon to give Diddy a “post-coital meal” and he “was naked and made comments about his body to plaintiff and ultimately asked the visibly uncomfortable plaintiff if she was attracted to or liked his naked body.”

Another time, Rueda was allegedly subjected to sexual harassment from a male house guest who “approached plaintiff in the nude to ask her to look at and admire his genitals after he had engaged in sexual activity with another house guest.”

Rudea began working as a weekend chef in Diddy’s Los Angeles County home in January 2015 before being brought on full-time in September 2015. The filing claims she also experienced wage violations after she was not compensated for working more than 12 hours per day.

Other allegations include hostile work environment, intentional infliction of emotional distress and retaliation. Rueda alleged when she brought up the sexual harassment and the failure to pay overtime wages, she was framed for stealing a watch she said was given to her by a housekeeper who found it in the trash.

Rueda was fired in May 2016.

“This is a frivolous lawsuit by a disgruntled ex-employee who was fired for cause,” Diddy’s rep said in a statement to TheWrap.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top