Singer Jamelia Just Wants More Black Dolls In UK Stores; Misguided Critics Call Her Racist

Singer Jamelia has long been outspoken about race-related issues and her questioning the lack of Black dolls in UK toy stores led to some accusing her of being racist.

The 36-year-old mother of two explored why there are so few non-white dolls available in the $4.27-billion UK toy industry.

“There may be, like, one Black doll on the shelf so, if it happens to be a Black one, [then] ‘Yes, I’ve got one!’ ” Deena Shayaam-Smith tells Jamelia on “This Morning” Wednesday, May 3.

“If they’re not seeing people that look like them achieve great things, they’re not gonna think they can do it,” Shayaam-Smith says.

Elsewhere in the segment, Jamelia visited stores and discovered non-white dolls, when available, were pushed toward the back of the shelf and out of sight, according to the Daily Mail.

Several watchers blasted Jamelia for the probe.

https://twitter.com/dazchad/status/859711154930823168

Still, many viewers had similar problems with finding Black dolls for their children.

Several questioned the idea that Jamelia is racist.

https://twitter.com/MrJ_Jakobbs/status/860455514081308673

https://twitter.com/HeyYaa93/status/860410800317628417

https://twitter.com/chriswillclark/status/860797197993992196

A couple of people the pointed to the independent creation of Black doll lines.

Jamelia responded to the on going debate Friday, vowing to continue to push for diversity and inclusion.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top