FaceApp Transforms Black, Asian Features to Caucasian Ones, Leading to Blacklash

FaceApp allows users to appear younger or look like a different gender. (Wireless Lab OOO)

A popular app allows people to transform their faces with various filters and one of them has led to accusations of whitewashing and racism.

FaceApp, available on iTunes and Google Play, uses artificial intelligence to change users’ faces to make them a different gender, age and have different facial expressions. One of the filters, originally titled, “Hot,” has come under fire for lightening users’ skin tones.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BTB2xC7A32c/

Some showcased well-known Black figures to display the disparency in the filter.

In response, users have taken to social media to criticize the app but also aired their grievances in the app reviews.

Developer Wireless Lab OOO responded to a customer who complained the app did not work well with dark skin tones.

CEO Yaroslav Goncharov issued a statement to BBC Newsbeat echoing remarks the company made to the dissatisfied customer and noting the filter name has been changed from “Hot” to “Spark.”

“We are deeply sorry for this unquestionably serious issue,” he said. “It is an unfortunate side effect of the underlying neural network caused by the training set bias, not intended behavior. To mitigate the issue, we have renamed the effect to exclude any positive connotation associated with it.”

Although the app’s controversial filter has changed, images of customers using it reveal it still has a lightening effect.

https://twitter.com/mo_hegs/status/856719438162403328

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top