Ky. Lawmaker’s One-Line Bill Would Abolish the Dept. of Education, Return Power to States

Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky. wants to put control of educational policy back in the hands of local governments by eliminating the Dept. of Education. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

The idea of Washington bureaucrats controlling the future of U.S. education makes this Kentucky lawmaker cringe. That’s why he’s attempting to ax the Education Department.

Republican State Rep. Thomas Massie on Tuesday, Feb. 7, introduced a bill to abolish the U.S. Department of Education. In a single sentence, Massie’s bill reads, “The Department of Education shall terminate on December 30, 2018” — a relatively straightforward proposal.

“Neither Congress nor the President, through his appointees, has the constitutional authority to dictate how and what our children must learn,” the Kentucky lawmaker said. “Un-elected bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., should not be in charge of our children’s intellectual and moral development. States and local communities are best positioned to shape curricula that meet the needs of their students.”

Massie went on to say that schools should be held accountable and advocated for parents’ rights to select the most appropriate educational setting for their kid(s) — whether that be public school, private school or home school.

His unconventional proposal came on the same day the U.S. Senate voted to confirm former Michigan senator Betsy DeVos for Secretary of Education. Her appointment — which wouldn’t have happened without the historic tiebreaking vote by Vice President Mike Pence — was contested by many liberals, and even some conservatives, due to her woefully limited experience dealing with the public school system. DeVos’ support for school choice, charter schools and voucher programs also made her an enemy among Democrats, who argued that charters and voucher systems would further privatize and threaten public education.

The notion of gutting the DOE is no new phenomena, however. Eliminating the government’s role in U.S. education has been on conservatives’ to-do list since the era of former president Ronald Reagan, according to news site Rare. The federal agency, founded in 1980 under the administration of President Jimmy Carter, has remained at the forefront of Republican efforts to dismantle the bureaucracy and return control of educational policy back to the states and local governments. However, the GOP took a break from these efforts during the presidency of George W. Bush, the news site reported.

More recently, notable conservatives like newly elected President Donald Trump and Energy Secretary Rick Perry also have pushed platforms advocating for the termination of the DOE. During his presidential campaign, Trump asserted that the “massive” department could be “largely eliminated.”

“D.C. bureaucrats cannot begin to understand the needs of schools and its students on an individual basis,” said North Carolina Rep. Walter Jones, who is a co-sponsor of Massie’s bill. “It is time that we get the feds out of the classroom and terminate the Department of Education.”

Other co-sponsors of the bill include Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), Rep. Jody Hice (R-GA) and Rep. Raul Labrador (R-ID), among others, according to Rare.

Legal analysts who spoke with 5 News Online said that eliminating the DOE would be no easy task. Because the department was established through the Department of Education Organization Act and approved by members of Congress, the only way it can be abolished is through the use of a replacement act.

“It would, of course, require another act of Congress to eliminate the United States Department of Education,” said Laurence Tribe, a Harvard legal scholar.

Massie’s proposed bill to dismantle the DOE will likely face intense push back from Democrats, especially in the wake of DeVos’ confirmation. There’s no word on when the legislation will be voted on.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top