Report: White House Will No Longer Send Surrogates to Appear on CNN

CNN is being iced out by the White House.

The Trump administration has reportedly refused to send any surrogates or spokespeople to appear on the network, ultimately freezing it out from on-air administration opinions, Politico reported. The news network has been embroiled in a bitter public feud with President Donald Trump and things have seemingly reached a fever pitch.

“We’re sending surrogates to places where we think it makes sense to promote our agenda,” said a White House official, adding that CNN is not such a place. The official noted, however, that the ban would only be temporary.

A CNN reporter has since spoken out against the White House’s injunction, asserting that the Trump administration was trying to punish the network and tank its ratings.

“They’re trying to cull CNN from the herd,” the reporter told Politico.

The White House is still taking questions from network reporters, but Trump administration officials like Press Secretary Sean Spicer and Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway haven’t appeared on a single CNN program since early January. Spicer acknowledged that he’s answered questions from CNN reporter’s during daily briefings at the White House but said he refused to “sit around and engage with people who have no desire to actually get something right.”

The discord between Trump and the news network began earlier this year after the president-elect refused to take a question from CNN senior reporter Jim Acosta following the network’s decision to cover an unsubstantiated report alleging that Russia had damaging information on Trump. The president has since blasted the news network time and time again, deeming their content “fake news.”

“You read all about Dr. Martin Luther King last week when someone said I took [his] statue out of my office, and it turned out that that was fake news from these people,” Trump said about CNN during an offputting salute to Black History Month at the White House on Wednesday, Feb. 1. “I think it was a disgrace, but that’s the way the press is. Very unfortunate.”

The Trump administration’s efforts to freeze out the network also could be related to program ratings, as CNN “Reliable Sources” host Brian Stelter reported that a close White House aide had warned him that his ratings would suffer if he did not have any administration voices on his show, according to Politico. Yet still, Stelter asserted that his ratings have been their highest since the November election, topping 1.3 million viewers.

“Before airtime, a Trumpworld aide predicted to me that the ratings for the programs would be hurt because no Trump administration officials had agreed to be interviewed,” Stelter wrote in a newsletter. “I think it’s worth noting that the aide’s prediction was wrong.”

There’s no word on when the White House will end its injunction against the network.

 

 

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top