Chaos Erupts After Minnesota Lawmakers Pass Controversial Bill That Can Limit Protests In State

[playwirevid id=’5312830′]

Minneapolis, Minn., protesters shut down a House committee session after congressmen passed a Republican-sponsored bill, House File 322, that will give local governments the power to sue demonstrators to recover law enforcement costs.

During the Tuesday, Jan. 24, session, John Thompson, protester and friend of slain Falcon Heights, Minnesota, man Philando Castile, was the most vocal after the bill passed with a vote of 9-6 in the House Civil Law and Data Practices Policy Committee. “Shame on you,” Thompson scolds the lawmakers. “You should leave because those seats you’re sitting in will be replaced by somebody who represents us.”

HF 322 would allow local police departments to charge protesters for costs associated with large-scale protests and demonstrations, reported CBS Minnesota. The bill was sponsored by Republican Rep. Nick Zerwas, who also was behind a bill that would penalize protesters more harshly for shutting down traffic on highways.

Critics of the bill claim the bill will target Black and brown protesters more because the majority of recent protests have taken place in urban areas.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top