MLK III Meets with Trump, Seeks Assurances About Protecting the Voting Rights Act

Activist Martin Luther King III ventured to Trump Tower Monday, Jan. 16, to meet with President-elect Donald Trump to discuss and defend the voting rights act.

Just four days out from Trump’s inauguration, King met with the intent to pressure Trump on voting rights for minorities, and he urged Trump’s critics to work with the president-elect despite philosophical differences.

“It is very clear that the system is not working at its maximum,” King says. “And through an op-ed you may have seen, we’ve provided at least a solution to begin to address a broken voting system. That was the dialogue, most of the dialogue that we talked about constructively.”

King said that his meeting was about the issues. In wake of a controversy between the real estate mogul and Rep. John Lewis of Georgia over the president-elect’s legitimacy, King offered to be a mediator.

“I am, as John Lewis and many others are, a bridge builder,” King says. The goal is to bring America together and Americans. We are a great nation. But we must become a greater nation. What my father represented, my mother represented through her life, and what I hope I’m trying to do is bring people together.”

Lastly, King wanted people to realize that there are bigger issues to focus on: “Things get said on both sides in the heat of emotion. And at some point, this nation’s got to move forward. People are literally probably dying. We need to be talking about how do we feed people? How do we clothe people? That’s what we need to be focused on.”

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top