Films Lacking Diversity To Be Disqualified From Certain BAFTA Categories

BAFTA Mask and BBC logo (Wikimedia Commons)

In a revolutionary move, the British Academy of Film and Television Arts will overhaul two of its categories to encourage more diversity in casting and on production crews.

Beginning in 2019, BAFTA announced, the categories for Outstanding British Film and Outstanding Debut by a British Writer, Director or Producer will need to meet the requirements of the British Film Institute’s Diversity Standards. To do so, filmmakers must demonstrate efforts have been made to improve the representation of underserved groups, like nonwhite individuals and people of lower socioeconomic status, in two of four categories: on-screen representation, narratives and themes; project leadership and creative practitioners; industry opportunities and access; and opportunities for diversity in audience development.

But that’s not the only change BAFTA is implementing. As early as next year, the ceremony, which is the British equivalent of the Oscars, will stop requiring prospective members to have a proposer and seconder to apply. The move will allow for a greater number of members and ensure that talent, not personal connections, is the only criteria considered for membership.

The push to increase diversity follows the #OscarsSoWhite controversy at the Academy Awards in 2015 and 2016. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has since announced plans to overhaul its voting guidelines and also has invited hundreds of new members to join. Such efforts will likely change the makeup of the organization, which currently has only 6 percent nonwhite members and has a median age of 63, according to Variety. Comparatively, BAFTA’s newest 375 member class was 18 percent non-white and had a median age of 44.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top