Jeff Sessions, Once Deemed Too Racist to be a Federal Judge, Chosen As Trump’s New Attorney General

Sen. Jeff Sessions (left) speaks at Donald Trump rally.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (left) speaks at Donald Trump rally.

President-elect Donald Trump is slowly but surely filling his Cabinet positions, tapping Sen. Jeff Sessions as his pick for U.S. Attorney General, officials close with the transition team announced Friday.

Sessions, a conservative lawmaker from Alabama, was also being considered for Secretary of Defense, The New York Times reported. Officials on Trump’s transition team struggled throughout the week to decide which position would best suit the senator.

As a former prosecutor elected to the U.S. Senate back in 1996, Sessions was known for his conservative resistance on issues like immigration reform and abolishing mandatory minimum prison sentences. He’s become a champion of upholding Republican ideals over the years, but Democrats and civil rights organizations alike aren’t too fond of him.

Due to a series of bigoted remarks he made in the past, Sessions was once deemed too racist to serve as a federal U.S. judge. He was nominated for a judgeship by Pres. Ronald Reagan in 1986 but was ultimately rejected because of his racially charged comments.

Sessions reportedly referred to the NAACP, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and other prominent civil rights groups as “un-American” and “Communist inspired,” according to The New York Times. Black federal prosecutor Thomas H. Figures even testified that Sessions called him “boy” and said he had no issue with the Ku Klux Klan until he realized they smoked weed.

Sessions asserted the KKK comment was simply a “joke.”

The Alabama senator also was accused of speaking unfavorably about the Voting Rights Act and the strict oversight it has placed on several Southern states.

J. Gerald Hebert, director of the Voting Rights and Redistricting Program at the Campaign Legal Center in Washington, testified against Sessions at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in 1986, as well, stating that the senator had suggested a white lawyer working for a Black client was a “race traitor.” Hebert worked alongside Sessions for a few months in Alabama as he worked on voting-rights cases for the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, the Huffington Post reported.

“Over the course of those months, I had a number of conversations with him, and in a number of those conversations, he made remarks that were deeply concerning,” Hebert said.

Sessions also allegedly used the n-word to refer to the only Black commissioner in Mobile, Alabama, at the time.

But officials on Trump’s transition team have seemingly turned a blind eye to the racist comments, as the senator was still hand-picked to serve in Trump’s Cabinet. To this day, Sessions vehemently denies the racism claims that have dogged his career for decades.

“I am not the Jeff Sessions my detractors have tried to create,” he told The Washington Post. “I am not a racist. I am not insensitive to Blacks.”

“Racism is totally unacceptable in America,” Sessions said earlier this year. “Everybody needs to be treated fairly and objectively.”

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top