John Legend Has Zero Patience for Former Obama Adivsor Who Insists Trump Is Not Racist

Musician John Legend and political insider and former President Barack Obama advisor David Axelrod got into an heated exchange during a recent appearance on HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher.

On Friday’s episode, the former Obama aide tried to make the case that President-elect Donald Trump really is not a racist. “The thing that I find offensive is I don’t think Donald Trump is a racist,” said Axelrod, who insisted that Trump is merely an opportunist who used white rage and racism to his advantage.

“It’s not just impolite,” Legend said. “It’s threatening people’s lives. If you think Mexicans come into this country to rape and murder your family, that means their life is threatened.”

After Axelrod made the claim, Legend and Maher verbally accosted him, reminding him that Trump and his father were sued by the Justice Department in 1973 for alleged racial discrimination at Trump housing developments in New York.(The case eventually was settled two years later after Donald Trump tried to countersue the Justice Department for $100 million for making false statements. Those allegations were dismissed by the court.)

The panel then erupted into a cacophony of inaudible banter.

At the end of the clip, Legend points out the serious repercussions of the president-elect’s rhetoric.

“This is not academic. This is not just a conversation of politeness and political correctness …,” Legend said. “[It] is about people’s lives and them being in danger because we have a racist running the country.”

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top