Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Video/News Video
News VideoVideo

Van Jones Leaves CNN Panel Speechless as He Explains the ‘Whitelash’ that Led to Trump’s Win 

Posted byBy Ricky Riley | Published on: CommentsComments (0)

During CNN’s election night coverage, political commentator Van Jones dissects the root causes of Donald Trump’s ascendancy to the presidency.

Jones states that Trump tapped into a rural america’s growing resentment with the Washington establishment. In addition, the commentator captures the fear of Muslims, Black people, and women after Trump’s campaign —-and subsequent win —exposed the racial, xenophobic and misogynistic underbelly of America.

“It’s hard to be a parent tonight for a lot of us,” he starts as he refers to Hillary Clinton’s long career in politics. “… You tell your kids don’t be a bigot. You have people putting children to bed tonight and they’re afraid of breakfast. … How do you explain this to your children? I’ve had Muslim friends who are texting me tonight, saying, ‘should I leave the country?’”

Jones implies that Trump’s win will give his supporters newfound courage to “attack” those who are not like them. However, he concludes that Trump’s win is the result of a storm of white male backlash.

Most— if not all– stems from human rights movement such as Black Lives Matter calling for police accountabilty. Additionally, there was a desire to reclaim the nation after President Barack Obama reign of liberalism.

“We’ve talked about everything, but race tonight,” Jones states. “This was a whitelash – this was a whitelash against a changing country. It was whitelash against a Black president, in part. And that’s the part where the pain comes.”

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top