Marc Lamont Hill Points Out Symbolism Between Muhammad Ali and Kaepernick’s Protests

In an exclusive interview with Revolt TV, Morehouse professor Marc Lamont Hill voices his support for San Francisco 49ers QB Colin Kaepernick’s national anthem protest.

In addition, he compares the importance of boxing legend Muhammad Ali’s Vietnam War protest to that of Kaepernick’s.

Hill starts off the short clip stating that Kaepernick is making a commitment to the protest, because he cares more about fighting injustice than celebrity.

“Everybody can be radical when there is no price to pay,” Hill explains. “Colin Kaepernick decided that he is more committed to being someone whose work will be celebrated … [His activism] is coming out of a Jim Brown tradition.”

By the end of the 6-minute interview, the political commentator connects Ali and Kaepernick’s stance against American injustices.

“Muhammad Ali was supposed to go into the draft but he wasn’t going to be given a gun,” he starts. “It was a boxing tour … He wasn’t going to be any more danger than the people at home … Ali was giving up money… Because it was the right thing to do.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top