This is What Giuliani Heard After DOJ Released Its Scathing Indictment of Baltimore PD

 

On the Aug 10. edition of Fox News’ “Your World with Neil Cavuto,” former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani insinuates that the findings in the Department of Justice’s report—- exposing racist policing in the Baltimore, Maryland—- are not factual because the DOJ works under President Obama.

The former mayor let his displeasure be known :

“And now, we have the Justice Department, which is filing against the police department, we’ve had verdicts by, in this case an African American judge, that two of these police officers were innocent. Anybody else has been let off or found not guilty, and they bring these charges. I mean, this is a political operation. I feel hurt by that, because I devoted 15 years of my life to the Department of Justice. From the very bottom, assistant U.S. Attorney, almost to the top, the third-ranking official under Ronald Reagan. I loved Department of Justice. I love what it stands for. I admire Robert Kennedy as an attorney general, and Bob Morgan at DA, they were both Democrats.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top