Megyn Kelly Confronts, Cuts off, Yells at BLM Activist DeRay Mckesson over Edward Nero Acquittal

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=615KWU6FhNA

 

On last night’s edition of Fox News’ The Kelly File, host Megyn Kelly and #BlackLivesMatter activist DeRay Mckesson discussed the acquittal of Baltimore officer Edward Nero in the killing of Black resident Freddie Gray.

In the nearly 5-minute interview, Mckesson tells Kelly that Nero’s acquittal “guarantees officers will not be held accountable for their actions.”

The activist believes that the officers posed the biggest threat to Gray. He goes on to say that Gray will not get the justice he deserves.

The Fox News host insists that there was no specific evidence to back up claims of Nero being connected to Gray’s death.

Then the conservative journalist tells Mckesson: “Don’t you see the danger to the community if we start locking up cops for exercising poor judgment?”

Mckesson says that there are five other cases and that the evidence in those cases has yet to been seen.

Kelly interrupts and cuts the activist off as she becomes irritated with his answers.

She implies that the judge being African-American proves there is no racism in the case or the verdict.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top