Countries in Africa Lead Others in Renewable Energy Sources, But Continent Mostly Still Runs on Coal

Wikipedia

Wikipedia

 

Renewables in Africa make sense in one big way. In much of the continent, grids don’t yet exist to carry power from a huge thermal generator to all the corners where it’s consumed. Newer technologies such as solar and wind could reduce the need ever to build them.

There’s a precedent. In Africa’s telecom sector, the lack of fixed infrastructure led to the primacy of mobile phones for everything from democracy and health to banking. Mobiles, and the services available through them, reached areas landlines never made it to. Some see that kind of “leapfrogging” already happening in renewable energy vs. traditional energy.

“Africa’s green power sector resembles mobile communications a decade ago,” wrote the authors of a study released this month by the Economist Intelligence Unit. “There is a large pool of African consumers able to buy power but simply lacking appropriately priced and designed options.”

The progress is evident in a comparison of renewables as a share of total power systems, in Africa and elsewhere. In the chart below, the top five African countries by market share are compared to the G7 group of developed nations. The latter for the most part have power grids, and therefore encounter a problem when it comes to integrating renewables into existing systems. But they also have a lot more money to invest.

Of course, there’s still a long way to go before Africa can really lead the world in renewables. Most of the continent still runs on coal—49% of the power comes from the most polluting power source on the planet, and a large chunk of the rest is gas. That compares to just 5% from renewables. (Large hydro schemes account for another 20% in Africa.)

There are a range of projects underway in Africa. At one end of the spectrum, private companies are offering pay-as-you-go solar units on a householders. At the other, governments are building wind farms.

Read more here.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top