Black History Banner Defaced with Bananas, Prompts #BeingBlackAtClemson by Students, Faculty

A racially charged gesture influenced the hashtag that flooded the social media feeds of several Clemson University students Monday, after a banner that was meant to commemorate Black history on campus was vandalized with bananas.

The campaign, “See The Stripes,” tweeted a photo of the defaced banner and wrote, “ means waking up to bananas hanging from a sign in front of the university’s plantation house,” according to The Huffington Post.

https://twitter.com/_ShadeLord/status/719543628431929345

After the first post, an assembly of students and faculty began using the hashtag #BeingBlackAtClemson to share their experiences of the discriminatory acts that they have seen on the South Carolina college campus, as well as to bring awareness.

https://twitter.com/FemiNia_/status/719546123451547648

A white English professor, Jonathan Beecher Field,  wrote an article in the school’s Tiger News in response to the outraged reactions of students.  He referred to those reactors as being “among Yik Yakkers” in his candid post.

The professor wrote that the vandalized banner was a part of a series of signs on campus commemorating various aspects of life at Fort Hill, which is the name of the plantation that Clemson’s founder inherited from his father-in-law. Fields stated that banners like the defaced lamppost was an effort to mark and document the presence of African-Americans in the history of Fort Hill.

“Clemson has a long way to go to come to terms with its history, a history that is interwoven with the realities of slavery, racism, segregation and the violence that attend them, but these banners were a small, visible step in the right direction,” Field said.

The professor expressed through his article that students need to “grow thicker skin” because it was “just a couple of bananas.”

For centuries, the banana has been used as a racial sentiment to dehumanize Blacks by comparing them to monkeys and apes. Racism is a present issue around college campuses across America. Last October, a group of students at the University of Missouri lead galvanized protests to demand profound changes in the systematic racism they say pervading their campus, according to USA Today.

Clemson University President James Clements sent a university-wide message shortly after the incident that said “This type of conduct is hurtful, disrespectful, unacceptable and will not be tolerated.” He added, “Clemson University is committed to providing a safe, encouraging environment which supports and embraces inclusiveness at every level.”

Although Clements’ four-sentence response was prompt, it didn’t satisfy some members of the campus’ community, according to The Huffington Post. Yet the professor offered some advice to students and faculty on handling the aftermath with sensitivity.

“Instead of telling Black folks to be a little tougher, I suggest that white folks challenge one another to be a little bit smarter. And by ‘smarter,’ I mean ‘more empathetic,’ ” he wrote. “It takes more energy to understand why someone is angry than it does to explain to them why they don’t deserve to be angry, but it might be worth the effort.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top