South Africa Court: President Violated Constitution for Using Government Funds to Pay for His Home, Critics Call for His Impeachment

The highest court in South Africa has ruled that President Jacob Zuma violated the constitution when he failed to repay government money spent on his private home.

It gave the treasury 60 days to determine how much he should repay.

The ruling is a victory for the opposition, who said they would push for Zuma’s impeachment. They accuse him of using “ill-gotten wealth” to upgrade his home with a swimming pool and amphitheatre.

Zuma has denied any wrongdoing. A government statement said he would “reflect” on the judgement and take “appropriate action.”

A spokeswoman for the governing African National Congress said the party’s top six officials, who include Zuma and his deputy Cyril Ramaphosa, would meet to discuss the implications of the ruling, Reuters news agency reports.

Zuma has up to now refused to bow to pressure to resign.

An anti-corruption body, known as the public protector, ruled in 2014 that $23 million had been spent on his rural home in Nkandla in South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province.

Zuma had “unduly benefited” from the renovations and should repay a portion of the money, the public protector said.

In a unanimous judgement on behalf of the Constitutional Court’s 11 judges, Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng said the public protector was a “Biblical David” fighting against the Goliath of corruption. Zuma’s failure to repay the money was “inconsistent” with the constitution, he added.

“The president failed to uphold, defend and respect the constitution,” he declared.

Mogoeng added that public officials ignored the constitution at their peril, and should remember that the rule of law was the “sharp and mighty sword that stands ready to chop the ugly head of impunity from its stiffened neck.”

The case was brought by two opposition parties, the Economic Freedom Fighters and the Democratic Alliance. The EFF called on Zuma to step down, while the DA said it would table a motion in parliament to demand his impeachment.

Zuma’s term in government has been marred by allegations of corruption and cronyism. It is very difficult to see how the ANC can continue to have Zuma at the helm, following the stinging rebuke he received from the Constitutional Court.

Opposition parties now plan to strike against the 73-year-old leader, and hope that ANC MPs will vote with them to impeach him. Another option is for the ANC to recall Zuma, as it did with his predecessor, Thabo Mbeki, in 2008.

Read more at www.bbc.com

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top