Henna Hair Dye, Used By Many Naturals, Gives Woman Bad Reaction

YouTube

Chemese YouTube

A Black woman had an allergic reaction after using henna hair dye. The Grio reports Chemese Armstrong wanted to add some color to her hair, and when she used the plant-based hair colorant, it caused her face to swell.  The lifestyle blogger posted a photo on her Instagram page showing her eyes swollen shut.

After learning she was allergic to paraphenylenediamine, an ingredient in commercial hair dye, Armstrong’s doctor suggested that she try the henna as an alternative. Armstrong described the incident on her YouTube page and visited a salon in Austin on March 5 to apply the dye. The following morning she had an allergic reaction.

“I woke up and my face was swollen,” said Armstrong. “And my scalp was on fire and I was in severe pain.”

Lots of Black women who wear their hair in its natural  – or textured – state, and those who chemically straighten their hair, use henna. It is a plant derived from the subtropical regions of Africa, southern Asia and northern Australasia. Mostly used to dye skin and hair, the plant usually turns hair a reddish color. It also has strengthening properties and is frequently touted as a natural and safe way to increase hair’s resistance to breakage, according to Madam Noire.

Armstrong said in a YouTube video that she doesn’t like doctors, but eventually she did see one to get treatment. After getting a shot to relieve her pain and swelling, she later found out that the henna used in her dying process was not chemical free. The self-proclaimed naturalist said she is now 75 percent better, but she still has some darkness and dryness surrounding her face.

“This just made me realize that I need to pay more attention to what I put in my body,” says Armstrong. “And what I put on my body.”

The entire ordeal is discussed in the vlogger’s video below.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top