ASOS Apologizes for Selling ‘Slave’ Merchandise Modeled by a Black Man

AsosASOS is under fire for a T-shirt with the word ‘slave’ plastered on its front.

This shirt and other apparel has created a maelstrom on Twitter after users expressed outrage and concerns over the historical insensitivity implied by such merchandise.

The fact that it was being modeled by a Black man only added gasoline to the fire.

The shirt was designed by a street-wear graphic designer Russell Reid. He operated under the seller name Wasted Heroes that happens to be based out of Liverpool.

Twitter users saw the irony in releasing a product like this during Black History Month. ASOS owned up to the misstep, and the company issued an apology via Twitter:

“This product was created by an independent seller & we removed it from the Marketplace site asap- Sorry for any offense caused.”

https://twitter.com/danhails97/status/695005587139121154?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

30D9569600000578-3430513-Twitter_users_were_upset_that_ASOS_were_selling_the_T_shirt_with-m-40_1454537395182

Many of the Twitter users who pointed out the shirt were white. At this point, it is clear the designer made a regrettable decision hiring a Black model for the job, and the model made a poor decision agreeing to do this.

The English empire built its wealth off the backs of enslaved West African people. They left nations in constant turmoil and raped the lands of natural resources and valuables. The fact that Black history  and Black people are trivialized like this shows the lack of respect Black people had to endure for far too long. In many cases, the English have failed to make amends for their actions and continue to take advantage of African nations for resources.

Since yesterday, the shirt and other “slave” apparel have been removed. ASOS is looking into fixing its unregulated marketplace after this incident.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top