Missouri Bill That Proposed Stripping Scholarships if Athletes Protested Is Pulled

Black football players MissouriEarlier this week, Missouri State Rep. Rick Brattin proposed a bill that would take away the scholarships of college athletes that participated in campus protests. By Thursday, Brattin pulled the bill from the floor amid outrage and public backlash.

If the bill was passed, the state would’ve suffered financially in regards to its higher education and university system. Many college athletes and top recruits wouldn’t have attend Missouri colleges. In addition to that, the amount of revenue college athletes brought in to those colleges would’ve diminished drastically. Football alone brings in an estimated $1 million per game. However, the biggest concern the bill would’ve caused if were enacted, was legal violations to students’ freedom of speech.

“It’s not quite clear how the rule would have been enforced,” SB Nation said. “The bill didn’t offer any punishment for a school that wouldn’t pull scholarships. And it’s worth noting Missouri’s athletic department is financially self-sufficient, operating off of private donations and athletic revenue, not public state funds.”

Brattin’s proposal comes after last month’s protests at the University of Missouri. Graduate student Jonathan Butler held a hunger strike to demand that the college’s president, Tim Wolfe, resign. It was not successful until the college football team went on strike as well, stating that they would not play if the racial issues on campus were not addressed and Wolfe finally stepped down.

This protest launched a national movement, to the displeasure of conservatives, but the movement has produced feasible changes to the way college campuses handle race. Brown has invested $100 million to specifically address this issue.

As the Black on Campus movement grows, there will likely be more backlash from the right.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top