Biloxi, Mississippi Joins Growing Group of Cities Running a Debtors Prison Against Poor People for Profit

Vector illustration of a man in jailA lawsuit filed by the ACLU against the town of Biloxi, Mississippi reveals a disturbing trend of cities jailing poor people when they can’t pay fines for minor offenses. A Department of Justice report, in the wake of the Michael Brown shooting, revealed this was being practiced in Ferguson, Mo.  Several other cities in the St. Louis-area were also facing lawsuits over their jailing practices. Now The Huffington Post reports Biloxi has the same problem.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit Wednesday claiming the city’s municipal court structure was unconstitutional and “instilled fear and panic amongst the poorest residents of the city and the surrounding region.”

Joseph Anderson, one of the plaintiffs in the suit, said he was jailed for seven days because he owed the city a whopping sum of $170. Anderson is 52, has suffered three heart attacks and a stroke, and gets by on Social Security and food stamps.

Anderson’s girlfriend, Qumotra Kennedy, another plaintiff, also had similar problems when she and a friend were arrested for running a stop sign. She spent five days in a filthy jail cell before she got to see a judge. When she complained of being cold, she was offered a sheet that smelled of urine. The ACLU lawsuit stated the city was unfairly punishing poor people who didn’t have the means to pay fines.

“Indigent people who owe money to Biloxi, including people who are homeless or disabled, feel pressured to divert funds for basic necessities— food, medication, utilities, and transportation—to avoid jail and the devastating impact of incarceration on their families, loved ones, jobs, and housing,” the lawsuit states.

Being jailed can be a major setback to people who are already struggling to get by. Kennedy discovered she had been laid off after she was released from jail.

“[My boss] told me that he’s sorry, he had to let me go because I missed too many days,” Kennedy told the Huffington Post. “My work is not steady, and it’s hard to find a job right now, the way the economy is out here. I can’t pay something I ain’t got.”

Nusrat Choudhury, an attorney with the ACLU’s Racial Justice Program, said Biloxi was running a two-tier justice system. One for the rich, and another for the poor.

“It’s essentially a jailhouse shakedown. Cities across the country, like Biloxi, are scrambling to generate revenue, and they’re doing it off the backs of poor people,” said Choudhury. “Being poor is not a crime. Yet across America, people are being locked up because they can’t afford to pay traffic fines and fees. This lawsuit seeks to dismantle a two-tiered system of justice that punishes the poorest, particularly people of color, more harshly than those with means in flagrant violation of the constitution.”

According to the ACLU lawsuit, about 27 percent of Biloxi’s population lives below the federal poverty level. But the city’s budget saw a 26 percent increase from fines and forfeits between fiscal year 2008-2009 to 2015-2016.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top