11 Acts by The US Government That Proves White Affirmative Action Has Been The Status Quo Throughout U.S. History

Indentured Servitude

Indentured Servitude (late 1600’s)

Indentured servitude was the earliest form of white affirmative action. Established in the late 1600s, this system replaced white European indentured servants, the original source of no-wage labor, with enslaved Black people.  An article entitled “A Long History of Affirmative Action – For Whites,” which was published by California Newsreel, states that “in exchange for their support and their policing of the growing slave population, lower-class Europeans won new rights, entitlements, and opportunities from the planter elite.” This phenomenon was only the beginning of the practice of white affirmative action in this country, an institution that is still very much a reality in today’s society.

 

Naturalization act

Naturalization Act (1790)

The article released by California Newsreel describes the Naturalization Act of 1790 as legislation that “[opened] the doors to European immigrants but not others.” It did so by only allowing “free white persons” to be classified as “naturalized citizens.” As a result, only these white individuals were granted to right to vote, hold public office, and be part of a jury. In some cases, they were even permitted to own land. However, these rights would not be granted to those of Africa descent for hundreds of years.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top