Some Startups are Fighting Workplace Bias in the Technology Field

employee-communicationWorkplace bias may prevent certain companies from hiring people that might not necessarily fit the role of the typical employees the company would usually hire. These subconscious biases prevent real diversity in the workplace and also prevent new ideas from developing.

Fixing this is simple. Tech start-ups like cybersecurity firm, RedSeal, and software startup, Unitive, started looking at their hiring ads and how they were worded.

“Companies often err by using phrases like ‘fast-paced’ and ‘work hard, play hard,’ which telegraph mainstream male,” says Unitive CEO Laura Mather.

Instead, NPR reports, Mather encourages firms to use of terms like “support” and “teamwork” in job descriptions, which tend to attract minorities. The reality is that tech companies that hire the same type of worker draws from the same talent pool. If small start-ups aim for the same workers as Google or Facebook, the small guys will lose out because they can’t offer as much money or the same type of benefits as the tech giants. So small start-ups may want to diversify but maintaining the status quo is increasingly becoming a survival tactic.

Companies like Unitive are employing the ideas of psychologist Anthony Greenwald, who developed the seminalĀ Implicit Association Test in the 1990s at the University of Washington. The test proved that participants associated words like “good” with white and words like “bad” with Black. Realizing that words matter, CEOs like Mather wanted to emphasize more inclusive language.

Companies are also looking at blind auditions, which tests for skills relevant to the job. There are also companies that want to additionally remove identifying information from the application process as well.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top