One Year Later: 8 Moments That Proved That Michael Brown’s Death Was Definitely About Race

via latimes.com

via latimes.com

The Ferguson Police Department’s History of Racism

Darren Wilson, the ex-cop who killed Michael Brown, worked for the Ferguson Police Department, which is “guilty of racism as well as systematic and often brutal targeting of African American citizens,” according to a 2015 article written by Lauren McCauley, a staff writer for Common Dreams. In fact, a federal investigation reveals that while Ferguson has a population that is 67 percent Black, Black individuals account for 96 percent of citizens arrested during traffic stops. In addition, 88 percent of cases filed concerning police brutality and excessive force involve Black victims. Even Wilson’s supervisor, Sgt. William Mudd, was fired for emailing a racist joke around the department.

 

 

via cnn.com

via cnn.com

Wilson Upholds Racist Stereotypes

When describing his interaction with Brown, Wilson stated the following: “He looked up at me and had the most intense aggressive face. The only way I can describe it, it looks like a demon, that’s how angry he looked.” The undertones of his description of Brown closely mimic the historical stereotypical caricature of the “brute.” An article released by the Jim Crow Museum of Ferris State University conveys that this caricature “portrays black men as innately savage, animalistic, destructive, and criminal — deserving punishment, maybe death. This brute is a fiend, a sociopath, an anti-social menace. Black brutes are depicted as hideous, terrifying predators who target helpless victims, especially white women.”

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top