Sudanese President Has an International Warrant for His Arrest on Charges of Human Rights Violations

Sudan's President Omar Hassan al-Bashir

Sudan’s President Omar Hassan al-Bashir

A South African judge has issued an interim order to prevent visiting Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir from leaving the country due to an international warrant for his arrest on charges of human rights violations.

The International Criminal Court has called on South Africa to arrest al-Bashir for war crimes and crimes against humanity over atrocities allegedly committed in the conflict in Darfur.

Judge Hans Fabricuis urged the South African government to take “all necessary steps” to prevent al-Bashir from leaving the country, but he postponed until Monday a hearing on whether to order the Sudanese leader’s arrest on the ICC warrant.

But an arrest warrant for al-Bashir could prove moot after all. South Africa’s Eyewitness News quotes Sudan’s Information Minister Ahmed Bilal Osman as saying the Sudanese president has already left Johannesburg and is on his way home.

Reuters, quoting local media, reports that Fabricuis said if al-Bashir were allowed to leave, it would damage South Africa’s reputation.

Even so, South Africa’s ruling African National Congress (ANC) declared soon afterward that the ICC is “no longer useful for the purposes for which it was intended,” according to Reuters, which said “[An] arrest in South Africa appears unlikely because President Jacob Zuma’s government has given immunity to any leader or delegate attending the AU summit.”

Read more at npr.com

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top