Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Editor's Picks
Editor's PicksListRace

10 Legitimate Proposals That Could Finally Close America’s Massive Racial Wealth Gap

Posted byBy Taylor Gordon | Published on: | Updated on May 8, 2015 CommentsComments (0)

housing discrimination

Stricter Enforcement of Housing Anti-Discrimination Laws

There are a plethora of ways Black would-be homeowners are discriminated against when trying to get mortgage loans or otherwise fund their efforts to purchase a home, a major gateway to attaining overall wealth. Critics believe stricter enforcement of anti-discrimination laws could help level the playing field and get more Black people to own a home. “Things like the mortgage interest tax deduction provide a high benefit to people who earn at the top of the income distribution, whereas those who earn at the bottom earn very little of that deduction, and that’s because it’s based on house values,” a senior policy analyst at Demos and co-author of “The Racial Wealth Gap: Why Policy Matters” told Forbes.

Black home owners

Authorizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to Help Homeowners in Financial Turmoil

Discriminatory practices by banks and other lenders leave Black people facing subprime mortgages far more often than their white counterparts. This ultimately forces them into financial turmoil as they try to pursue one of the key pieces of the puzzle to building their wealth. The authors of “The Racial Wealth Gap: Why Policy Matters” proposed that authorizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to “modify mortgages in ways that make them more sustainable” could help decrease the size of the racial wealth gap.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top