NY Art Exhibit Exposes the Racist, Sexist Messages Hiding in a Century of Ads

7264d3d6-b0d9-4b22-ae6b-408695c541a8-620x594The representation of Black women in TV and film is a topic that has garnered much discussion and attention for years but less frequently explored are the subliminal messages that also plague the world of advertisements.

Artist Hank Willis Thomas is hoping to change that with his latest exhibition, “Unbranded: A Century of White Women, 1915-2015,” showing at the Jack Shainman Gallery in New York until May 23.

The exhibit strips advertisements from the last century of their text and branding in order to draw attention to the raw images that are ubiquitously displayed throughout pop culture.

Without the distracting logos and catchy slogans covering the advertisements, all that’s left are racist, sexist images that glorify the image of white women when compared to their Black counterparts while also ensuring women aren’t portrayed in a way that makes them equal to men.

The majority of the advertisements supported three troubling ideas: Black women are subservient to white women, women will always be competitors rather than companions, and even as women make strides towards equality they will still continue to be measured by their sexuality and physical attributes.

“A lot of the ads in the exhibition show women with their husbands, or their daughters, or their lovers,” The Guardian writes of the New York exhibit. “But there isn’t a single ad that shows female friends together, enjoying each other’s company while fully clothed.”

When women did appear to be happy in a group together, they were flaunting bikinis or other scantily clad displays that seemed to be ripped from a man’s fantasy.

Then there were the collection of ads that served as a troubling reminder for women to not feel too comfortable about the strides they have made in garnering equality in the workplace and society as a whole.

As women were finally getting the right to vote and were taking up roles in the military and holding down full careers, the ad world exploded with messages that objectified them.

“This is particularly evidenced in the 1960s where many of the ads show women decapitated, bruised, caged, or being pulled apart by men,” The Guardian explains. “You can count your freedoms, the images seem to say, but the sum of a woman still boils down to aging skin and sexual orifices.”

One of the cringe-worthy photos has a petite woman in her underwear as she is surrounded by a group of men in business clothes tugging away at her arms.

Eerie smiles have crept across their lips as the woman’s hair swings down in front of her face.

In the sea of misogynist ads breaking women down to little more than the objects of fantasy and cattiness, racism also makes its presence known.

The ads have a stunning lack of Black women present overall, but when they do make an appearance their purpose is clear.

They are typically serving a white woman or meant to represent something exotic and “other.” They are never merely a part of the community at large.

0ab05319-f065-4ecd-98ea-bd61c40c038a-652x720“As blatant racism gets less socially acceptable, the message becomes coded,” The Guardian states. “An ad from 1974 shows a spectrum of female faces going from black at the bottom to white at the top: a hierarchy in which blacker is definitely not meant to be better.”

Fortunately, more modern ads did finally incorporate more positive representations of Black women with the help of well-known figures like Serena Williams

In one ad she is seen accepting a gift from a white woman kneeling in front of her for a Tampax advertisement.

Thomas noted that “the rise in appreciation” for these Black women can be credited not only women like Serena but also Michelle Obama and Beyonce.

As such figures rose to popularity, it forced ads to take a different look at the underlying messages they tried to send in their ads.

The exhibit marks yet another time that Thomas has explored the messages in advertisements.

In 2007 he highlighted the presence of Black men in ads with “Unbranded: Reflections in Black by Corporate America, 1968-2000.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top