Yaphet Kotto Slams Idea of a Black James Bond as ‘Silly,’ Ignoring the Racial Disparities That Still Plague Hollywood

Yaphet-Kotto-Live-and-Let-DieLooks like Deadline’s Nellie Andreeva may have a new best friend.

Shortly after Andreeva penned an article criticizing the fact that Black stars were getting roles that weren’t originally written for Black characters, actor Yaphet Kotto is mirroring those sentiments in relation to the upcoming James Bond flick.

Kotto, the actor who played the first and only Black bond villain back in 1973, criticized the idea of a Black man playing James Bond as “silly” because the character was originally written to be a white man.

It’s a shocking statement following the release of emails that revealed former Sony Pictures Entertainment co-chairwoman Amy Pascal advocating for Idris Elba to star as the special agent hero in the upcoming Bond movie, Spectre, slated for a November 2015 release.

There has been a great push for more diversity in Hollywood in recent months, so many were happily welcoming rumors that Sony may be introducing the first Black Bond in their new film.

Kotto, on the other hand, is clearly against the idea.

“James Bond cannot be Black,” Kotto charged in a recent interview with The Big Issue. “Political correctness be damned, we have to stay with what is literally correct.”

According to Kotto, the “literally” correct interpretation of Bond must always be a white man.

“He was established by Ian Fleming as a white character,” he continued. “It’s silly.”

It’s the same type of claim that critics presented when actor Michael B. Jordan was selected to take on the role of the Fantastic Four’s Johnny Storm or when Elba took on the role of Heimdall in Thor: The Dark World.

Kotto’s comments add to a growing list of claims that Black actors should not be allowed to take on “traditionally white” roles even if they were created during a time when racism discouraged writers from coming up with Black characters.

“I don’t think it’s right for Black actors or writers to do roles that whites have made historically white heroic roles,” Kotto continued. “These roles are not written for Black men. Black men should stop trying to play white heroes. We have pens. Put a Black man in a role that no one else has established.”

Of course, Kotto’s suggestion for more Black people to pick up their own pen and write more Black stories ignores the fact that there isn’t actually a shortage of writers who want to tell the stories of authentic Black characters.

What tends to be the case is that Black writers, filmmakers and talent are shut out of Hollywood as distributors turn their backs on them and financial backing becomes nearly impossible to attain.

Racial disparities still plague Hollywood’s landscape even as Black stars have filled a few lead roles on TV.

Kotto’s comments seem to overlook this fact and suggest that Black stars should never have the opportunity to take on the widely popular and hugely profitable superhero franchises that have historically only featured white heroes.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top