7 Studies That Prove White Teen Drug Use Far Exceeds That of Black Teens

teen drug abuse

Far Fewer Black Teens Have Substance Disorders

Data collected by the National Survey on Drug Use and Health revealed that out of more than 70,000 participants, roughly 5 percent of Black youths reported having any sort of substance disorder, according to a Time article published in 2011. Meanwhile, 9 percent of their white counterparts reportedly had or were still dealing with substance disorders.

drug use white teens

White High School Seniors Tend to Have Highest Rates of Drug Use

A 2014 study by University of Michigan researchers focusing specifically on drug use among students found that white teenage students were far more likely than Black students to use “hallucinogens, amphetamines, methamphetamine, sedatives (barbiturates), tranquilizers” and other drugs. The study also revealed that while students of all races tended to have high rates of use of at least one sort of drug at some point, by the time students reached the 12th grade level white students had the “highest lifetime and annual prevalence rates among the three major racial/ethnic groups for many substances including synthetic marijuana, LSD, hallucinogens other than LSD, narcotics other than heroin, amphetamines, sedatives (barbiturates), tranquilizers, been drunk, occasions of heavy drinking in the last two weeks, cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top