Move to Restore Voting Rights to Former Convicts Could Dramatically Change Black Voting Power

ohio-black-votersWith the introduction yesterday of a new bill in Congress that would restore voting rights in federal elections to nearly 4.4 million former convicts, many advocates believe there’s a groundswell of support for the measure that could eventually lead to passage.

It’s an issue of enormous importance to the Black community, as the massive rise in incarceration in the last three decades has left millions of Black former inmates without the right to vote. In fact, currently 1 in 13 Black people in the U.S. are barred from voting because of these disenfranchisement policies, according to the Sentencing Project.

Passage of such a measure could dramatically change the complexion of the voting populace in many states, which could in turn change the complexion of many elected officials—which is likely why the opposition to such legislation has historically been led by Republicans, who fear former convicts would overwhelmingly vote Democratic.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder last year said the disenfranchisement of ex-convicts disproportionately hurt Black people and called for an end to the policy.

The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School said 35 states currently have policies on the books preventing people from voting after their release from prison.

“At a time when our country is considering the legacy of Selma and the equality at the ballot box it helped bring, preventing people from voting is just not acceptable,” Nicole Austin-Hillery, director and counsel of the Brennan Center’s office in Washington, D.C., said in a press release.

Deborah J. Vagins, senior legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, in an ACLU press release reminded Congress that many of the disenfranchisement laws passed by the states were specifically passed during the Jim Crow era to keep Black people from voting.

In combination with the massive incarceration of Black people, it is hard to reach any other conclusion than that the nation has systematically conspired to keep power out of the hands of Black people.

The current bill, called the Democracy Restoration Act, was introduced by Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., and Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich. But similar bills have been introduced on numerous occasions only to be stalled by Republican opposition. Opponents have claimed that former felons should not be trusted to influence the making of new laws by voting.

In its press release, the ACLU claimed that support for rights restoration is growing.

Perhaps one piece of evidence is the fact that serious presidential candidate, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, has introduced his own limited form of such a bill—one that would restore voting rights for nonviolent offenders.

In addition, similar bills are under consideration in states like Maryland and Kentucky, some with bipartisan support, according to the ACLU.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top