8 of the Most Racist Movie Characters Of All Time

Halle Berry’s ‘Monster’s Ball’ Character Leticia Musgrove

In the 2001 movie, a racist white correctional officer named Hank (Billy Bob Thornton) kills a Black man and shacks up with his Black widow. That plotline, despite valiant efforts to be a salvation story for a hopelessly racist white Southerner, ends up portraying the exact opposite of its purported message.

This is especially evident in the sex scene where a desperate and mourning Leticia begs her husband’s killer to “make me feel good.”  To make matters worse, the Academy saw it fit to validate the racist portrayal by awarding Berry an Oscar, making her the first and only woman of African descent to win one for a leading role.

 

Soul Man‘Soul Man’
The character Mark Watson, portrayed by C. Thomas Howell in the horrible 1986 movie with a misguided premise, Soul Man, is a white guy who pays his way through Harvard Law School by getting a scholarship reserved for Blacks only. So how does he exist with the scholarship on campus? In black face. Enough said.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top