10 Disturbing Online Comments From Cops About The Eric Garner Decision That Will Make You Cringe

21-eric-garner-protest-2.w529.h352.2x

‘[Law Enforcements] Are Sacrificed for Ungrateful, Spoiled, Hateful Animals’ 

While Black parents are working to make sure their children won’t be the next victims of police brutality, one officer is concerned about keeping his or her sons from becoming officers because they are being “sacrificed” for “hateful animals” — a term that person found appropriate for discussing unarmed Black citizens who were killed by the officers who were supposed to serve and protect them. “I WILL DO EVERYTHING IN MY POWER TO KEEP MY 2 SONS FROM EVER, EVER BEING LEOS [law enforcement officers].” SAPDMAS wrote. “This profesion [sic] has been thrown under the bus and we have little to no support anymore. I will not let my sons be sacraficed [sic] for ungrateful, spoiled, hateful animals.” 

 

 

141203-garner-protests-jms-2131_0628af1f04852df8b5cd29129f25dc42

‘Hands Up Fo Chicken Wings. Hands Up Fo Obamaphones. Hands Up Fo Free Cheeze’

“Hands Up Don’t Shoot” became one of the many chants used as protesters flock to the streets in their communities to make their voices heard and stand in solidarity with the victims of police brutality. One officer decided to twist the chant and turn it into a foul, racist chant of his own. “Hands up-fo chicken wings-hands up fo Obamaphones-hands up fo free cheeze,” the comment read. The officer went on to praise the grand jury and referred to the Rev. Al Sharpton as “Alwhore Sharpton” and a “skull headed leech.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top