10 Fascinating Things About Slavery in New York City That You May Not Know

6e8702

In the 1700s, a Large Percentage of the Enslaved in New York Came from Jamaica

Between 1700 and 1774, the British imported between 6,800 and 7,400 Africans to the colony of New York. It was cheaper for New York slave traders to import directly from Africa than to buy enslaved Africans from elsewhere. Despite this deep discount, less than 30 percent of the enslaved imported to New York before 1741 came directly from Africa. Nearly all of the rest came from the English sugar islands of Barbados, Antigua and, most of all, Jamaica, from which 30 percent of all New York’s enslaved Blacks came. Another 35 percent came from elsewhere in the West Indies, while less than 3 percent came from South Carolina.

 


jacobharsenhouse

Life Was Extremely Hard for Enslaved Women in the Early 1700s

Most enslaved women were dead by age 40, and their mortality rates peaked between ages 30 and 34; they died of disease or complications of childbirth, exacerbated by poor nutrition and years of toil. Some were simply driven mad. In 1749, a “Negro Girl of about 15 Years of Age,” who “had been for sometime disordered in her Sences,” fell, or more likely, jumped “out of a garret window three story, of which unhappy fall she was so bruised, that she dyed in a few hours.” One owner sold his enslaved female in 1756 “because she breeds too fast for her owner to put up with such inconvenience.” Infant mortality was high, and infanticide not uncommon, although it is unclear who was committing infanticide — mothers or masters.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top