Man Whose Teeth Broken By NYPD Files Excessive Force Lawsuit

ABS_Hassam KhanAn NYPD officer, who allegedly broke the teeth of a Staten Island man during a car stop on Dec. 26, 2013, is being sued for using excessive force.

Hassam Khan, who was driving his friend’s Mercedes Benz, claims that the police rushed to the car with guns drawn and ordered him out of the vehicle, according to opposingviews.com. Khan says the officer grabbed him and slammed him face first onto the car. Khan’s two front teeth broke and left a noticeable dent on the car.

Khan filed a lawsuit on Monday at the Brooklyn Federal Court. The suit claims that officer Mark Scarlatelli demanded to know where the drugs were and that he insisted Khan was intoxicated after slamming him into the car, according to the Daily News.

“My client was subjected to brutal force for no reason,” Khan’s lawyer Harvey Greenberg told the Daily News.

After being forced face first into the car, the officers searched the car for illegal contraband.

“I think they thought they were going to be heroes and tore his car apart, but when they didn’t find anything they didn’t know what to do with him,” Greenburg told the Daily News.

According to Greenberg, Khan was charged with reckless driving, resisting arrest and obstructing government administration. Khan previously pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct under the direction of another lawyer who was close to the family.

This month, the Civilian Compliant Review Board confirmed Khan’s allegation of excessive force against Scarlatelli, improper search of the car by detective Steven Marshall, and officer John Ryan for failing to notify the Internal Affairs Bureau about the injuries, Greenberg told the Daily News.

The suit will be reviewed when it is served to the city, according to a spokeswoman for the Law Department.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top