Is Electing More Black Politicians the Answer to the Community’s Woes? One Leading Voice Says ‘No’

ABS_Black voteBruce A. Dixon, managing editor at Black Agenda Report, said that voting more Black faces into official positions isn’t the solution to problems facing African-Americans.

His comments, made to Press TV, were in response to the Congressional Black Caucus’ stance after the grand jury in Ferguson, Mo., decision was announced Monday night.

“The Ferguson grand jury’s decision not to indict officer Darren Wilson in the death of Michael Brown is a miscarriage of justice,” CBC Chair Marcia Fudge (D- Ohio) said in a statement. “It is a slap in the face to Americans nationwide who continue to hope and believe that justice will prevail.”

Dixon pointed out that the Congressional Black Caucus is the same group that “originally approved the militarization of police throughout the United States,” he told Press TV.

He disagrees with the idea that electing Black officials is a real solution because the same issues are having an affect on cities with Black leaders, too.

“The same sort of things that are happening in Ferguson are happening in cities and towns across the United States, where the police forces have been led by Black faces, and cities are led by Black mayors – places like Philadelphia, Atlanta, and New Orleans,” Dixon said.

Dixon says that it is a systemic failure that is affecting African-Americans in the United States. Electing “more black faces to high places… does not change the system fundamentally at all,” he said.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top