Years of Economic Inequality Push Wealthy Blacks to Be More Conservative with Investments than White Counterparts

The nation’s top 5 percent of wealthy African-Americans are being extremely cautious when it comes to investing their money compared to their white counterparts and differences between each demographic suggests that years of economic inequality could be to blame.

Wealthy white Americans are being much riskier when it comes to investing their money, and in recent years those risks have really paid off.

Wealthy Blacks, on the other hand, have not seen major returns on their investments, which are mostly isolated to real estate and savings bonds.

A study conducted by Credit Suisse in conjunction with the Institute on Assets and Social Policy at Brandeis University revealed that major differences between the nation’s wealthiest Black and wealthiest white Americans could explain why one group is willing to take more risks with their money.

A key difference was the amount of money each demographic had.

The top 5 percent of wealthy white people still made a significantly greater amount of money than the nation’s wealthiest Blacks.

The top 1 percent of the wealthiest whites alone made nearly six times more than the top 1 percent of the wealthiest Blacks.

Any investor will be more willing to make riskier investments if they have a larger amount of money. With the top percentages of wealthy whites making such staggering amounts of money, investments that could be incredibly risky for wealthy Blacks might not seem so intimidating to a white investor.

Statistics also revealed that many wealthy Blacks didn’t see much longevity in their financial success.

One in four African Americans who were in the top quartile of Black wealth holders in 1984 were no longer in that same quartile by the time 2004 came around.

Myths about the Black community convinced some people that African-Americans were simply poor business owners, but the report shed light on some of the real factors that are causing Black businesses to go under.

Black business owners were found to get approved for bank loans less often and those loans are usually of much smaller sizes with higher interest rates than whites who request the same loans with similar financial backgrounds.

With so many racist institutions taking aim at Black wealth, Credit Suisse’s chief marketing Screen Shot 2014-11-25 at 3.25.00 PMand talent officer and head of the bank’s New Markets efforts, Pamela Thomas-Graham, understood why wealthy Blacks weren’t willing to be as risky with their investments.

“If you are in the top five percent and you are African-American you probably are smart to have a more cautious approach,” Thomas-Graham told the Washington Post. “Historically, there is more [downward] mobility, and fragility.”

It certainly makes risky investments seem exponentially more intimidating than they should be, but financial experts believe there is a lot of profit to be made by Black investors going out on a limb and taking that leap of faith.

Wealthy Blacks had much lower rates of investments in businesses, stocks and mutual funds when compared to whites.

That’s where most of the money is being made and it’s causing the wealth gap to continue to grow, the study suggests.

For every $1 the wealthy African Americans had, their white counterparts had nearly $8.

“It is possible people are not seeing the full range of options that are available,” Thomas-Graham said.

With the stock market soaring, investors believe now would be a great time for many wealthy Blacks to take those calculated risks and increase their wealth with high-reward investments.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top