Study: Unless Wall Street Hires More People of Color, Nation Could See Another Financial Catastrophe

Lack of diversity on Wall Street A new study suggests that the lack of diversity on Wall Street could land the entire country in more financial hot water by creating more dangerous financial bubbles.

Financial bubbles tend to appear when traders overvalue their assets—stocks, bonds and other finances are assumed to be worth more than they actually are. When that bubble bursts, the results have the potential to create economic catastrophe. Prices drop exponentially, people lose unusually large amounts of money and the ensuing panic leaves a nation’s financial sanity hanging in the balance.

It’s happened here before and t’ll happen here again—unless Wall Street increases its workforce beyond the sea of white males who currently predominate, according to a recent study conducted by six professors and published on Monday by the Proceedings of the National Academy.

The Wall Street being dominated by white men means the group of homogenous traders are considered more likely to create a dangerous financial bubble than if people of diverse backgrounds came together to trade.

A 2013 study revealed that more than 80 percent of all the managers on Wall Street are white and more than half are men, according to the Huffington Post.

The study said it’s all about how comfortable people tend to be with one another and how much trust people put in others who remind them of themselves.

“Traders in ethnically homogenous markets are significantly less accurate, and thus more likely to cause price bubbles,” the report said after revealing that “pricing accuracy is 58 percent higher in diverse markets.”

It’s a remarkable finding in an industry that has traditionally paid scant attention to diversity. If it can be shown that a blindingly white workforce actually hurts the bottom line—and hurts the national economy as well—there might be more pressure placed on firms to train and hire non-white candidates.

The report said that people of diverse backgrounds are more likely to have some tension between employees, which encourages traders to be more skeptical of financial valuations.

As for non-diverse groups, it was less likely that the traders were willing to question one another and they were more likely to conform, regardless of how inaccurate the valuation may really be.

Diverse group of traders see better results “The presence of more than one ethnicity fosters greater scrutiny and more deliberate thinking, which can lead to better outcomes,” the research paper said.

This is only the latest study to slam Wall Street’s lack of diversity and prove that its incredibly high barriers to entry for people of color and women are extremely problematic.

Studies in the past have found that many men in the financial market are often overly confident.

The studies suggest that by introducing more women, who tend to be more analytical about taking risks, the entire economy could see a boost.

There have been attempts to create legislation to regulate and encourage the hiring of people of color, but there doesn’t seem to be any evidence that these efforts have been effective.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top