10 Reasons Why HBCUs Are Turning White

white homecoming queen hampton

Forced Integration

After a 1992 Supreme Court ruling, the U.S. government and various states sought to immediately increase white enrollment and faculty recruitment at HBCUs.

In 2002, Mississippi HBCUs were awarded $500 million to upgrade their schools. The schools were forced to integrate classes by bringing a certain number of white students and faculty in order to receive federal monies.

In 1992, Tennessee State University was told by its state legislator that if it didn’t increase its student and faculty white numbers by 50 percent in 1993, it would be forced to shut down.

 

Obama HBCU Budget Cuts

Just months into his first term as president, and after receiving unyielding support from African-Americans during the 2008 election, President Barack Obama’s White House announced that it would continue the cuts by former President George W. Bush to HBCUs by decreasing the budgets by up to $85 million. At the same time, he granted Hispanic-serving schools up to $200 million in increased funding.

Obama imposed major cuts to HBCUs again during the second term of his presidency. The Plus Loans cuts cost HBCUs $160 million, and more than 28,000 students were denied loans and were unable to attend school during the 2012 academic year.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top