7 Jamaican Freedom Fighters Whose Stories Must Be Told on Film

nanny

Nanny

Nanny, a woman from the Ashanti tribe, was a leader of the Maroons, enslaved Africans who had escaped the plantation life at the beginning of the 18th century. She was an outstanding military leader who was a thorn in the side of the British in their battles as she outsmarted, outplanned and outmaneuvered the British at every turn. Besides inspiring her people to ward off the troops, Nanny was also a type of chieftainess or wise woman of the village, who passed down legends and encouraged the continuation of customs, music and songs, that had come with the people from Africa, and which instilled in them confidence and pride. She also had responsibility for the welfare of the women and children in the community; even the king had to call upon her for advice, especially those relating to women. For more than 30 years, she freed more than 800 enslaved people and helped them settle into Maroon communities. In her lifetime and after, she was seen as a symbol of unity and strength for her people during their time of crisis, and her settlement, called Nanny Town, remained under Maroon rule.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top