Appropriation: When Style Is ‘Ghetto’ on Blacks, ‘Chic’ on Whites

Something about the models walking the DKNY catwalk last month in coifs that Lucky magazine called “slicked-down tendrils” — known in my hood as baby hair — tweaked my Queens-reared soul.

I felt a similar pull in April when Marie Claire called Kendall Jenner’s cornrows “epic.” Hmmph — no one ever declared mine anything but necessary for swimming in the summertime.

That tug was followed by a twinge last week when Los Angeles Times reporter Ingrid Schmidt wrote a story about braids, referring to Bo Derek as their matriarch. Hello, what about Cicely Tyson?

Add Vogue’s recent article claiming we’re in the era of big booties — because Iggy Azalea and Kim Kardashian are making round backsides aspirational for the masses — and you might as well render me invisible.

My issue isn’t with borrowing elements of style that started in the heart of Black America. Appropriation has been at the center of pop culture since well, the dawn of culture.

What’s difficult to digest is this “praise” of all things Black — from cornrows and large booties to acrylic nails, door-knocker earrings, and tribal fabrics — only becomes “chic,” “trendy,” and “epic” when worn by white women. When these same cultural markers are on Black women, they are “ghetto,” “urban,” and “ratchet” — meaning, unpretty.

“It’s offensive,” said Doreen E. Loury, director of Pan-African studies at Arcadia University. “The natural beauty of Black women that has been historically demonized and classified as unattractive, is now the runway’s hottest new swag. And it’s not even being celebrated on Black bodies.”

To make matters worse, Black women are rarely, if ever, credited as these trends’ impetus. That distinction goes to the designers’ inspiration boards, so what could have been viewed as a form of flattery is now just an insult.

Read more at articles.philly.com

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top