Black Twitter Takes on Vogue, Cultural Appropriation

black twitterRemember that time Marie Claire applauded Kendall Jenner for rocking “new epic” cornrows and Twitter had a meltdown? Well, it appears Vogue just kicked off take two.

The fashion and lifestyle magazine published an article Wednesday titled “We’re Officially in the Era of Big Booty” in an attempt to give a history lesson on the progression of cultural regard for derrieres in anticipation for the release of a new Jennifer Lopez and Iggy Azalea song.

The majority of criticism lies in the article’s failure to look back further than the 1990s or acknowledge the specific relationship between popular opinion, butts and the female black body — but people have a lot of bones to pick with Vogue’s booty argument.

Naturally, Black Twitter responded the best way it knows how — with the creation of a hilarious, biting hashtag: #VogueArticles. In two days, over 4,500 tweets have swarmed the Internet with fake article names shaming cultural appropriation.

vogue 1“How Paula Dean created soul food. #voguearticles “@ellewhyin

“Dreadlocks: Apparently Not Just For White Hippies and Backpackers Anymore #voguearticles” @seelolago

“Bill Clinton On What It Was Like Dealing With Racism As The First Black President. #voguearticles” @ProfessorBLove

“How Macklemore Made Rap Cool Again: Rise of the Socially Conscious Rapper #voguearticles” @deathintwosteps

“Collard Greens Are The New Kale #voguearticles” @runawayapricot

Source: huffingtonpost.com

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top