It is often taught that Black people first arrived in the Americas during the slave trade. But that history is in the process of being rewritten as archaeologists continue to find evidence that Black people occupied the American content before the Bering Strait was crossed by Mongolian Asians.
According to the BBC documentary series Ancient Voices and some scholars, these peoples were the Black aboriginal people of Australia and Melanesia. They were later massacred by the invaders from Asia.
Here is some of the evidence that has been presented to prove Black people were the first to populate the Americas.
Human Skulls
Human skulls have been uncovered in Central and South America that are 9,000 to 12,000 years old, among the oldest skulls in the Americas.
Walter Neves, an archaeologist from the University of Sao Paolo, has taken extensive measurements from dozens of skulls, including the oldest, from a young woman whom the archaeologist named Luzia, discovered in Lagoa Santa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. “The measurements show that Luzia was anything but mongoloid,” he says.
Reconstruction of Luzia’s 12,000-year-old skull by forensic artist Richard Neave from the University of Manchester, England, showed all the features of a Negroid face, Neave said in a 1998 segment of the BBC documentary series Ancient Voices.
In the broadcast segment, the scientist concluded that the dimensions of the prehistoric skulls found in Brazil matched those of the aboriginal people of Australia and Melanesia.
Interesting read
Where does Adam and Eve fit into this picture. The Bibles timeline puts Adam and Eve at a little over 6000 years old, these black people are 12,000 years old?
Pre-Adamites
Enos, Adam and Eve are mythology and do not fit on the timeline. In fact, there are both fossils and trees older than 6,000 years.
Nope. Adam and Eve are mythology.
Slow up! Africans might have crossed from Australia, but in Dr. David Imhotep's book "First Americans Were Africans: Documented Evidence" ..you will see that West Africa is closer to East most part of Brazil. The distance is shorter than from Australia to the New World.
If you really pay attention of what's going on with all these different findings and the blackness erased from all of His"story", it's blatantly clear who was here first who really invented this who really did that. Come on people it was the people of the darker persuation. Bottom line the Europeans went on a killing spree, touching all of the known world,(Alexander the Great), or the religious wars back then where they were going from place to place burning down towns , cities, Castles along with majority of the real history of events throughout time and rewriting the history to make it lean another direction from the truth. If you're control the known world you control history.
Yep everything has been white washed just like how the Spanish trying to conceal the real history of the MOORS. If you look it up most of the images are white men and not of the black men they actually were.
Looking forward to reading and learning more about these new discoveries.
Aaron W. Johnson , talk to them.
Adam and Eve = immagination creations: Myths. Some people may not get it!
can you guys do some research before you spread lies.
The skull dimensions and facial features match most closely the native people of Australia and Melanesia. These people date back to about 60,000 years, and were themselves descended from the first humans, who left Africa about 100,000 years ago.
there is no such thing as black Australia or Melanesia
Stop looking for your slave master to educate you about you. We will have to write and teach our own history to whoever wants to learn it. As Dr. Clarke once said, you can't expect the same people who mistreat you to teach you!
Look up Old Creationism
People will find out eventually, let them believe what they want to believe. If they want to believe Yeshua is a myth, let them. God will have no pity on them in the end because it was their choice. 🙂 Pre-adamites are beings that are usually millions of years old, not these ppl. Humans are 200,000-present. I personally believe in Old Earth Creationism.
Lisa Thompson Just like a typical theist to place blame and fear upon those who do not place their trust in mythologies. You're in the right to follow whatever belief you want, though, science is truth. Unlike the religion you arrogantly hold that does not change regardless of new evidence that shows up, science does. What holds as question in science today will be answered, unlike religion, it can be experimented and its conclusions can be properly recorded. .
"“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” Neil deGrasse Tyson
Oh, and just to add on that smug smiley face after your claim of your god's unsympathetic nature based on choice, I have a scripture you, like many of your various faiths cherry pick and forget.
"For I take no pleasure in the death of anyone, declares the Sovereign LORD. Repent and live!" – Ezekiel 18:32
Lisa Thompson I am well aware of it, and it still does not hold any weight. What you're suffering from is cognitive dissonance, when, despite the overwhelming evidence that debunks religious based creation stories, you'll still deny it to ensure your own belief is real when it is not.
Anyone ever noticed that it appears that black people tend to claim they are the first on every Continent? First in Europe, First in America, First in Asia and of course the first in Africa. We have already established that EVERYONE was black in the beginning, everyone tracing their origins there before black was a color. Then of course color came into existence, then races appeared to included Africans, Europeans, Asians then other subset groups likes Indians, Native Americans, the South Pacific islanders, Arabs etc. But for some reason Africans due to your inferiority complex due to slavery and colonialism have a need to claim everyone's identity. The Aborigines are clearly black, along with other pacific islanders however they are clearly not Africans. Asians are clearly not white, and some are dark with "african features" but clearly they are not Africans. Italians, Greeks, Native Americans, and Arabs have Africanistic features but clearly they are not Africans. They are of a different sect. But for some reason Africans who are quite aware that there are several black races on earth that aren't Africans, (mind you there are several white races too, that due to racism only claim their ethnic identity) desired to paint every dark race as their own, in spite knowing that our origin and their origins are completely parallel to each other and can only meet when there was no color.
You are the first person that should take your own advice about "…do[ing] some research before you spread lies." Especially after making that ridiculous statement about there being no such thing as Black Australia or Melanesia(it's too late in the day to act like you don't how to find a photograph or dictionary). If the indigenous people of Melanesia and Australia "…date back to 60,000 years and were themselves descended from the first humans, who left Africa about 100,000 years ago.", how are Melanesians and the Australian aborigines not Black? It's well documented that those cultures had no contact with Western imperial cultures until the late 18th century.
But black was not a color in the beginning. Therefore in the beginning man was colorless.
What you to understand, OTHER "Races" don't have an identity outside of what we call Africans. .. They are scientifically just mutations of so-called Africans… That's why you will see their features every where… You must understand that the ruling power if the present world, the Caucasians, deemed it unnecessary to give credence to the originators of culture, The wooly haired black people of the world. Peace.
A must watch is Hidden Colors documentaries, it at least shed some light on this subject. I will have my child watch it too.
C.a. Newry Do you mean 'color blind' ? Cuz I've never seen a colorless person.
Ian C. Patterson this notion of just because you ancestors come from Africa makes you black is lazy scholarship considering there were intermixing with other ethnicities .
trying to find connections through just visual similarities is outdated considering we use DNA mapping and Melanesian have interbred with the denison (ancient human species)whose cousin to the neanderthal, Melanesian and Aborigines genetic study in India found similarities among Indian archaic populations
In a genetic study in 2011, researchers found evidence, in DNA samples taken from strands of Aboriginal people's hair, that the ancestors of the Aboriginal population split off from the ancestors of the European and Asian populations between 62,000 and 75,000 years ago
Tifani Irving-Fields that's right because even in English Literature, ex. Shakespeare and other European writers, the Moors, are depicted more factually, having darker skin and more African features as well
Lisa Thompson you are right. A thousand years is like a day to God and you multiply a 6,000 years x 6 days it would be 36 million years.
Darja Worldhope You do realize the error even in doctrine when it comes to Old Creationism, right? If you're explaining that evolution fits in with this, you'd be incorrect. Evolution requires certain members to die off, while others to live on and reproduce. Death wouldn't have entered the universe, let alone the Earth until Adam and Eve ate the forbidden fruit. So the Old Creationism is incredibly flawed.
lol interesting name
Enjoy reading your comments Aaron W. Johnson!
Shawn Mc Apparently we're both using the term "Black" in different ways. It seems that you're using "Black" and "African" or in a more general sense, "race" and ethnicity, interchangeably. Maybe you are specifically referring to certain African ethnic groups (and their descendants around the world) from the Niger-Congo and Bantu speaking regions of west and central/southern Africa (or sub-Saharan Africa) as being the only people on Earth that are considered black? Highlanders from Scotland, Slavs from the Eurasian steppes, and Ashkenazim Jews DNA varies somewhat due to genetic admixture, but all three are considered "White" people
When I use Black, I mean it based partially on phenotype/appearance and partially on modern society's definition of "Black". I'm just using skin color as the main factor. Using one classification method, Australoid (of which the Australian Aborigines and Melanesians fall under), Capoid, and Congoid are subtypes of the Africoid branch.
The fact that Melanesians and Australian Aborigines interbred with Denisovans (not denison) population, which accounts for roughly 3%-5% of their DNA, doesn't make them any less "Black", just as my having two 3X great grandfathers who were White and one 2X great grandmother from the Blackfoot confederacy makes me any less Black.
I'm a little familiar with genetic studies as well. The split you refer to is seen in Y-DNA Haplogroup CF which originated in East Africa (from the larger Y-DNA haplogroup CT) and broke off in the Levant around the time period you've given. Haplogroup 'C' went east and continued into Asia and is found along coastal regions of India, Southeast Asia, Australia, and the Pacific Islands. 'F' went north and in Europe, Near East Asia, and back into Africa.
Aaron W. Johnson Actually I'm not. 🙂 There are various sub theories in Old Creationism. You clearly don't know much about Old Creationism.
Aaron W. Johnson I said, believe what you like; if you take it as fear/blame, that's what YOU take it as. I take no issue with ppl who don't believe what I believe, that is your choice, however I've noticed that most ppl like you take issue with ppl who don't believe in what you do. I care not that you don't believe in Yeshua or the bible, that does not bother me nor does it concern me. I don't reject science, see the difference between Africans and Whites (if you're White) is that we don't separate science from spirituality/religion; if you're Black, you've unfortunately taken on White norms. It goes together. And the good thing about Yeshua is that he doesn't have to prove himself to you 🙂 Believe what you like, I do not care. The problem is that when you cherry pick, you don't have the full context, doesn't work, sorry. And what I mentioned was in the Apocrypha and yes science DOES CHANGE (please don't go here, this is my background).
Lisa Thompson If science is your background, you have little to no understanding of it. While theologian religion is faulty, my issue lies more with inaccuracies of attempting to fit mythologies into the collected, well researched science — it doesn't work, and that's something you'll constantly refuse so the view you hold onto doesn't fall a part.
Regarding the racial part of your argument, you've committed two fallacies here — the first, "No True Scottsman fallacy"; the second, "Generalization fallacy." It is rather both irrelevant and a crude attempt to discredit my argument anymore than yours, despite, unlike mine that is based on facts that can easily be searched on a search engine, are based on faith and faith alone.
Your god, Yeshua cannot prove itself, the reason being it's a myth. It's merely a cop out to suggest that it doesn't have to prove itself, despite not showing any evidence in the first place to suggest such a possibility. According to your argument, your god is apathetic to its creations, considering it doesn't care to show any remote evidence of its existence, so if it were true, why would anyone care to connect to someone who doesn't care about them?
Lisa Thompson Old Creationism is singular. You've posted yourself that you believe in Old Creationism, not that you believe in the various hypothesis of creationism. The yolk is on you, not me, so you can take that smile and turn back into a disgruntled frown.
Next time you should be more careful and understand the difference between singular and plural.
Aaron W. Johnson Old Creationism is a general heading/branch/taxonomy; it is neither plural or singular as it is a classification, say like the Elephas Maximus. One doesn't need to say which sub variation they believe in, nice try. You just didn't know the different sub variations of Old Creationism. Since we're on a grammar streak; it's 'hypotheses' not 'hypothesis.'
Aaron W. Johnson 'If science is your background, you have little to no understanding of it' You need to stop, you don't want to challenge me, however this is a usual tactic of Whites; you use language as a tool to prop up your overwhelming sense of superiority when in actuality, you don't know what you're talking about, so that won't work. It's as clear as day that you only understand the basics. A generalization is accurate when it's common amongst that general population and no it is quite relevant. You don't know what you're talking about.These are very real cultural differences to which you are supremely ignorant upon. Africans do NOT separate science from spiritual belief systems/religions. That is strictly a White European pattern. Secondly, the No True Scotsman fallacy does not apply. I did not eschew or exclude anything and I addressed the matter and I brought up a topic that serves to shed light on cultural differences which in fact make a WORLD of difference. We are not the same and as an African we view science very differently. I stated exactly what I meant and that doesn't make me any less of a researcher/scientist because I believe in a creator that you do not, as I've stated that is a White pattern, not an African one and until you understand this difference, you'll continuously parade your hebetude and ignorance for all who know differently. As I've stated, MY GOD doesn't NEED TO PROVE HIMSELF TO YOU, YOU ARE NOT GOD; he doesn't bow down to you; he doesn't answer to you; this is how I know you're White; you all have a God complex rooted in a false sense of self undergirded by a sense of superiority that unfortunately you all are victims of. If you're not well acquainted with the scientific process and how it functions/operates you should really really really refrain from speaking on it. I truly mean this; you sound utterly ignorant. I mean if you don't believe in Yeshua, why do you care if he presents himself? That's what always trips me up about people such as yourself. You're looking to be disproven. He doesn't always reveal things when we want him to. You don't know if your car is going run properly tomorrow do you?, however you have faith that it will operate properly. You don't know if a street light will function properly, but you have faith that it will, don't you? Very simple to see how faith works. Faith is the belief in the unseen, you can't use science to verify faith, that's not how it works. Don't connect, no skin off my back. I really mean this.
Lisa Thompson Can you at least break your argument into paragraphs, so I can understand what points you're attempting to get across? I thought you could since you're great when it comes to grammar.
I don't want to challenge you about science? Considering you have no grasp of it through your posts I don't believe I have to be concerned. Your only evidence for your belief is what you say rather than backed up, well researched evidence that can be tested, concluded, and recorded.
Regarding the once again derailing subject of racial generalization to the topic, first, you don't know what my race is. Second, it's both a True Scottsman fallacy and generalization fallacy, the reason being that the separation or collaboration of science and religion depends more on individual than actual racial groups. Not to mention, considering how I think is based on a perceived race is quite racist. You're suggesting that only one race is capable of doing something another cannot.
Continue to amuse me with your shenanigans, as you've discredited yourself over and over with religious bigotry and racist nonsense.
Aaron W. Johnson Facebook doesn't allow me to break them into paragraphs. If I press enter it will just post. I am not going to copy and paste from textedit. Well, I specifically mentioned you were either White or Black in the first post, but I'm pretty sure you're White, no one Black uses 'the true scotsman" ad hoc reference; red herring is usually more appropriate. 'Second, it's both a True Scottsman fallacy and generalization fallacy, the reason being that the separation or collaboration of science and religion depends more on individual than actual racial groups. ' INCORRECT: Again, Africans do not separate science from spirituality/religion. It works in tandem; it is not rooted in *parts*, it is viewed from a holistic standpoint. What I mean by separate is that they/we consider them to be NOT mutually exclusive. This is not a derailment this is an aspect that is important to understand because how Whites view science (excludes spiritual systems/religion), Africans DO NOT, no matter how much you WANT to dismiss this you can't. Africans are a COLLECTIVE oriented ppl, White Europeans are an INDIVIDUALISTIC oriented people, this is why you assert individualism and science/religion and then sit there and try and superimpose it on us Africans/Blacks who have a totally different culture and relation to science. You're what I call a sciolist. You don't know squat about the research. You cannot understand when generalizations are appropriate, you do not understand what outliers are, you do not understand reliability and validity as it relates to research; you do NOT understand that science is ever evolving/changing and that new hypotheses are put forth and old hypotheses challenged, some are discarded and some remain. New theories are put forth and old ones challenged, some are discarded and some remain. Furthermore, I am not rejecting science, again I don't separate it from my belief system, that is EUROPEAN. Racial generalizations are appropriate when these generalizations/patterns are present in that general population, how many times do I need to say this? However, this was really not an appropriate analysis on your part, as the individualism orientation is cultural. I'm sorry, where is the religious bigotry? How you think is typical of the common White Superiority Complex. Yes, I also have a background in Psychology. If you need help understanding the difference between individualistic and collective cultures, google is there for your use.
Lisa Thompson Actually, it does. Shift + Enter.
"but I'm pretty sure you're White, no one Black uses 'the true scotsman" ad hoc reference; red herring is usually more appropriate."
So are you a troll or just stupid? You realize by stating this you've just argued that black people are a limited collective. I simply skimmed over your derailing racist rant, and, frankly, the more you argue the more you're disqualifying the validity of your viewpoint with this thread.
A racist who merely hides behind religion…yeah, I've seen that far too often.
Truth! Im proud to be a descendent of the original ones. whether white people or other ppl or my own want to deny that, the proof is in the pudding and nothing can take away from that
Ian C. Patterson your right that word black and white is a rather popular term used mostly in the us to identify its population partially for devious reasons.white , black yellow red is too generic don't you thing ?
actual the subsaharan region was classified as negroid or capoid and then you have mongoloid and Caucasoid but there are more classes and i can see how the classes can makes some people upset
interbreeding does make you another race or class when done in your genetic structure and its proven by migration routes and evolution, the interbreeding happen thousands of years ago when they first left Africa and made their trip east.
these people have been isolated on that island for thousands of years and evolved over that time that's why they all look so similar.
you know about migration routes for all groups then why would you label them black ?
we all come from Africa does that makes all groups black ?
small proportions of genes found is significant when it comes to our ancestors,3.4-7.3% of neanderthal genes was found in non African people and look how different they are to us after thousands of years.
Ian C. Patterson defining someone ethnicity on their melanin composition is being lazy dude and you know this. there are people in India that's darker than most black folks and they are not capoid.
on a side note in relation with your 3rd paragraph a new study has come out that there was definitive mixing with some humans and neanderthals in Africa and some left and some stayed. that's a reason why you have some north Africans with a different phenotype from sub Saharan Africans
Absolutely nonsensical and false. Tell me if your theory is correct, then why do Whites, Asians, Latinos, etc. not refer to themselves as Black? YOU missed the entire point and whether you believe it or not BLACKS were the first in the universe…Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania. Scientists have enough information to not only prove but admit this truth. Indian, European, Arabs, etc. are NOT races. "Africanistic" is not a sociological term. It is Africazoid. Sect is never used to refer to ethnicity nor race. Get over yourself and try to think critically and not criticize what you have failed to learn. The objective of this article is to disprove the cover up by revisionists regarding racial theories. Please don't address what you have NO accurate or scholarly knowledge. The article BTW referred to Blacks and not so much Africans.
C.a. Newry Clueless. So what were they Albino? Go back to your world as you make no sense whatsoever.
Alonzo L. Barnes Thanks for speaking truth to power. They just can not handle the truth because they have worked hard at minimizing Blacks as their equal. It kills them thus the cover up, sanitizing, and whitewashing of history. It troubles their heads which clearly is a malady of their hearts.
Alonzo L. Barnes Thanks for speaking truth to power. They just can not handle the truth because they have worked hard at minimizing Blacks as their equal. It kills them thus the cover up, sanitizing, and whitewashing of history. It troubles their heads which clearly is a malady of their hearts.
I heard about this story years ago and watched the scientific program on it. It was amazing when they had re moulded the skulls and you could see that they were not Asian.
I am not sure about your Bible timeline, however, according to research life began in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania (West Africa). This site holds the earliest evidence of existence of human ancestors dating back far more than 6,000 years. This has led scientists to conclude that humans evolved in the Garden of Eden possibly 120,000-156,000 years ago. 6,000 years ago B.C. according to my research and studies Africans ruled the entire WORLD as far back as 12,000B.C. The revisionists like to begin history with the Greeks at 6,000 B.C. eliminating any prior existence but it is so false and nonsensical. They want us to believe that there was NO existence prior to the Greeks. Greeks learned everything they knew by frequently visiting Africa. Yet historians give them the credit for what they stole. I.E. claiming Hippocrates to be the father of medicine when in fact Amenhotep was the original Father of Medicine. Claiming belief in one God originated with Moses when it fact it was the great Pharaoh Akhenaten who spread "monotheism" which Moses believed and spread among the ancient Hebrews. All this occurred long before 6,000 years ago. In any event, research Mitochondrial Eve. Mitochondrial Eve + Y chromosomal Adam are the two individuals who passed down a portion of their genomes to the majority of humanity. Many believe it was the Garden of Eden but is is shrouded in mystery. Despite the Adam and Eve moniker, which evokes a single couple whose children peopled the world, they were not the only ones to have present day descendants. They simply passed on the Y chromosomes and the mitochondrial genome across thousands of years to most of us. The mutation rate was astronomical. Sorry to have gone on so far but this topic is of great interest.
I don't know what this one particular person was thinking when they commented on this article…The article clearly states that remains that were found were negroid…I don't know if you don't categorize or associate the results being African or relatively black than you must've read an entirely different topic all together…DNA Geneticist tell us today that Africans across the continent belong to the same mitochondrial halogen groups but physically can differ depending on the proximity of the equator…including hair texture, nostril sizes and skin variations…African intermingling with Neanderthal created the Mongoloid and European races…Aborigine and Melanesian at the end of the day are still Negroid/ African…If you are ashamed of your ancestors you can always perm your hair and apply skin lightner…Clown!
Aaron W. Johnson Thanks for the tip, will use it.
The history we are indoctrinated to believe is a total fabrication. Read Dr.Ivan Sertima book they were here before columbus. We were the indians black people. The transportation system was not capable of bringing millions of blacks. They met us here from South to North America. Look up the largest pyramid in Illinois see this unspoken history!
History is written by those that kill heroes. Imagine if Jesus could write his own story!!but no you know who did the most its that man called Paul one who stoned even Steven, not even peter wrote as good as this man. Can you think of the misintepretations and hell what else. Listern to burning Spear he says Christopher Columbus was adamn blastered liar. and he was white!!
Oh brother, pseudo-scientific racialism at it's worst. DNA and anthropological studies have all confirmed that ancient Americans still the ancestors of modern Native Americans and not some ancient 'black people.'
http://www.latimes.com/science/la-sci-first-americans-20140516-story.html
There is no such thing as a negroid skull.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HGmmNDlzgc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B19U4FP8QfcmYzhhODZmNzQtZDhkMy00YjIyLTlmZjctMTRiOWJhNWZmMTA4/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bjiquM-fZ1PutQI5tcP4MXMzSm9M7JOPsA_C6eKXXWI/edit?usp=sharing
Lisa Thompson — so you live by all the points of Leviticus ? All those "abominations" ??? No pork or shrimp ? Monthly ritual baths?
Lisa Thompson — so you live by all the points of Leviticus ? All those "abominations" ??? No pork or shrimp ? Monthly ritual baths?
O K Bryan, I DEMAND REPARATIONS FOR WHAT YOU DID TO MY PEOPLE !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why did they find a bunch of stolen stuff
You are right.
Well they were…no doubt about it once you take time to study. The Washitaw tribe and the Louisiana Purchase are the foundations in a deal gone wrong….
As the Empress of the tribe Quoted, "WHAT IS BURIED WILL SPROUT!"
Sheer ignorance is the answer. he has distorted the entire argument. Don't waste words, energy, or time on this caliber of mentality.
Ian C. Patterson This is what I call scholarship and tight cross referencing which most commentors lack. Thanks for the info.
Luci Ryan – Well Said. — No Books No Knowledge. Let me ask C.a Nwery – Who is Cheikh Anta Diop, Who is Ivan Van Sertima. Did know that ChristopherComeBusUs is NOT Spanish! — Stop having outer discussions and get to the inner discussions of reading…..
Brandon Russell – you are correct but we must not look at the So-Called — African as an alien to the land – These individuals were traveling before the Caucasians. …
Brandon Russell – you are correct but we must not look at the So-Called — African as an alien to the land – These individuals were traveling before the Caucasians. …
Jankeepingitreal Positive-Pruit – You are correct Sister – The Empress said.
Jameelah Ahmad I know Africans were traveling around the world before white people. My point was addressing that Africans were in the Americas before the Mongol Migration across the Bering Strait and they came by West Africa which is way shorter trip than from Australia to the Americas, not to say they didn't come over from Australia.
Jameelah Ahmad I know Africans were traveling around the world before white people. My point was addressing that Africans were in the Americas before the Mongol Migration across the Bering Strait and they came by West Africa which is way shorter trip than from Australia to the Americas, not to say they didn't come over from Australia.
Just sharing – Many stories regarding Travel and Residency of the Carbon People to and from these Geographical locations is so condense – that we sometimes fail to see the chronological order properly. The Carbon People have traveled this World like we go to the Mall, and the Grocery Store, etc. for thousands of years. Everybody is Correct but we all must focus on chronological order in order to get a clear view of how Carbon People lived, socialized, and traded — What I do know is that When "They" arrived they were dumfounded/surprised to find that many places were fully established with Law and Order and not savagery as the previous Explorers wrote!. —– Now for those who play the blame game – Get To the Library – and Lectures. Also look up those authors who wrote the negatives regarding the Carbon People. Those Authors wrote what they did because they hated that they had found another land full of law and order and in Pristine Condition. Before some folks speak, folks need to really take a look around. For Thousands of year the Carbon People cared for all the world, but those who became jealous and angry have destroyed it. It will take the Carbon people to restore it back to its pristine condition. —- And Oh, if this subject is not so important then get up off the land, the gold, the diamonds, the oil, the technology, the stolen patents, the our story from the Vatican, rebuild all the lands destroyed by bombs, R.B.N. & R.E. now! Get up off all that was stolen.. Or will Cricket be the selection of Music…
Because he is not what he seems…… listen to the words
Because he is not what he seems…… listen to the words
Ian C. Patterson – he aint who you think he is….. no waste words.
Ian C. Patterson – he aint who you think he is….. no waste words.
Ronald Racine – when we save up our money to go to the Mother land – there is where we learn the truth about – so-called A-Dam and so-called Eve!
Ronald Racine – when we save up our money to go to the Mother land – there is where we learn the truth about – so-called A-Dam and so-called Eve!
Those People Were of the Tribe of Gad .. Natives (INDIANS)
THE FIRST WHITE DID NOT COME UNTIL ESAU.
Luci Ryan let's go with Africans being the first on earth…one must now concluded that we all Africans…subsequently there is no need to differentiate…ie we all are human beings, no one more special than the other.
Alonzo L. Barnes Until Africans stop begging for acceptance, we will always be behind. there is no need for anyone to give credence to the originators of anything. africans must live and thrive and stop worrying about yesteryears.
Read: http://www.indigenous-americans.com/.
Shawn Mc lol.
Bryan did not do anything LOL but depending on the lineage of his ancestors.
They may have benefited historically in the foundation of wealth accumulation in some business or financial capacity from the institutions of slavery such as CSX Railroad, Aetna Insurance, Fleet Bank/Financial, J.P. Morgan Chase, Lloyds of London, Barclays Bank, U.S. Department of Treasury , the Rotschild's Foundations…and many more.So reparations for the descendants of ex-slaves is no joke it is a reality that many naïve ignorant Americans choose to ignore because it would mean righting some wrongs where there is no statue of limitations in the world court.The just thing to do would be to demand justice for the African Americans whose lineage involved chattel slavery thru the world court.The Jews, Native American Indians and Japanese have all received reparations and still are to some degree for past genocide and in interment to some degree or other.So just chill on making a joke about reparations for the descendants of ex-slaves because most of them built the infrastructure of the Americas that you enjoy today.
Luci is correct from my studies of Anthropology for instance. We have the Olduvai Gorge Tanzania Scientists.That gives reference to the Leaky family research among others which does confirm.That the orgin of the homo sapiens(thinking man) and homo erectus(upright man).Please go back to school or do adequate scholary research before you address what you have NO accurate or scholarly knowledge.
True Dr, Ivan Van Sertima has already documented and researched this in many of his books THEY CAME BEFORE COLUMBUS AND THE AFRICAN PRESENCE IN EARLY AMERICA AND THE AFRICAN PRESENCE IN EARLY EUROPE.
Very good research Mr Allen an good advice to those who try and distort scientific evidence and logic common sense is not so common.However when the light comes darkness and ignorance will vanish.
Giovanni Silva please reference the book The Golden Age of the Moor by Dr. Ivan Van Sertima if you have not already.I had the pleasure of reading and researching many of his books in my life time.As well as hearing his lectures along with video and slide show presentations on 3 separate occasions.The lectures went for not less than 3 hours and some as long as 6 hours with a break.You will find a wealth of scientific and historic knowledge in his books.
Josuha excellent point reference the book The Golden Age of the Moor by Dr. Ivan Van Sertima if you have not already.I had the pleasure of reading and researching many of his books in my life time.As well as hearing his lectures along with video and slide show presentations on 3 separate occasions.The lectures went for not less than 3 hours and some as long as 6 hours with a break.I am sure you have found a wealth of scientific and historic knowledge in his books.
Australoids are not negroids. Australoids are Australoids.
Find me an Aboriginal Australian that beleives they came from Africa?
There are none.
Only the scientists beleive that….and they are usually white.
Other scientists have proposed a multiple dispersal model according to which there were two migrations out of Africa, one across the Red Sea and along the coastal regions toIndia (the coastal route), which would be represented by haplogroup M. Another group of migrants with haplogroup N followed the Nile from East Africa, heading northwards and crossing into Asia through the Sinai. This group then branched in several directions, some moving into Europe and others heading east into Asia. This hypothesis is supported by the relatively late date of the arrival of modern humans in Europe as well as by both archaeological and DNA evidence. Results from mtDNA collected from aboriginal Malaysians called Orang Asli and the creation of a phylogentic tree indicate that the hapologroups M and N share characteristics with original African groups from approximately 85,000 years ago and share characteristics with sub-haplogroups among coastal southeast Asian regions, such as Australasia, the Indian Subcontinent, and throughout continental Asia, which had dispersed and separated from its African origins approximately 65,000 years ago.
Thank you Ms Sharon Irby…Two major migrations out of Africa…Bottom line…Africans are the Ancestors to the entire planet but not the Austroloids…Hmmm the world must still be Flat…
Thank you Ms Sharon Irby…Two major migrations out of Africa…Bottom line…Africans are the Ancestors to the entire planet but not the Austroloids…Hmmm the world must still be Flat…
Our people may miss why this is important–Its called Reparations as we are the true Indigenous people–look at President Obama he endorsed the UNRIP document(United Nations Rights of Indigenous People" That means NO TAX, NO MORTGAGE the land belongs to us. We must lose the European-Dutch Last Names get back with our Nations(Washitaw, Moors, Seminole etc) and reclaim the land. It was stolen from your ancestors you are not Negroes or Black People. Just do the research Obama already told Cherokee Indians they cannot deny us access to the Indian Nations(google it) this evidence applies to economics as the Europeans were not in America before us so how are they dictating that we should pay them taxes or a Mortgage on our land.
C.a. Newry The invisible man? 😉
I LOVE ATLANTA STAR"Rich in Black History."
How Embarassing the Pilgrim history should feel.