Advocate for Africa or Advocate for US Policy in Africa?

united africa 1In everything we do when it comes to Africa, we must do what is in the best interest of the continent. We cannot represent Western governments and represent Africa at the same time. The interests of The United States, for example, are diametrically opposed to the interests of Africa. We cannot be advocates for Africa on the one hand, and do the bidding of Western governments on the other.

When international organizations and the war machines of Western regimes wage unprovoked and unjustified criminal wars in Libya based on distortions and fabrications, or subvert the constitutional process in Cote D’Voire and collaborate in the overthrow of that government, we must stand firm with Africa and not only condemn the imperialist motives and destructive actions, but help create a strategy to help prevent such actions in the future.

We must strengthen these ties by advocating for Africa and not representing those who wish to continue to exploit Africa. We cannot allow ourselves to be the smiling Black faces of corrupt and morally bankrupt economic and military policies in Africa.

Uganda represents only one glaring example of a rotten policy in Africa. In October 2011, the Obama administration sent 100 well-armed Special Forces “advisers” to the region allegedly to assist the Ugandan government in the apprehension of Ugandan rebel leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), Joseph Kony. Never mind that both the Ugandan and U.S. governments knew that the LRA had not been operating in Uganda for at least six years.

The discovery of what might be Africa’s largest oil reserve in Uganda and the deployment of U.S. Special Forces is no coincidence. In addition, the United States has provided tens of millions of dollars in military aid to Uganda. It should be noted that Uganda has troops fighting the United States’ proxy war in Somalia under the auspices of the African Union.

Ironically, Uganda represents one of the best examples of the inconsistencies between U.S. rhetoric on African affairs and its actual policies. The United States has aligned itself with one of the most abusive regimes in Africa. We are doing Africa no favors by either remaining silent or publicly supporting destructive policies to avoid offending the current occupant of the White House.

We should honor Africa by being principled and honest with Africa. We should avoid congratulating regimes just for merely holding elections. We’re not doing Africa any favors by ignoring the need of serious reform on the continent. And not reforming Africa in to the image of Europe. We should support a reform that encourages the aspirations of African people; A reform that respects, honors, and celebrates the cultural traditions of Africa; and a reform that sustains the continent and its people  — not a continent whose resources are the life blood of the entire world, all while the people of Africa suffer.

Finally, Africans in the diaspora cannot be used as tools by African governments to gain access to Western capital. The strength of our bond lies in our shared cultural and historical legacies. We must cherish and nurture that bond and it will forever be strong.

Adisa A. Alkebulan, Ph.D. is an associate professor of Africana Studies at San Diego State University and executive director of the Diopian Institute for Scholarly Advancement.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top