Tamron Hall’s Natural Hair is a Big Deal – But Should it Be?

 

tamronhall_600Friday morning, Tamron Hall, the Today show’s first African-American female co-host, unexpectedly revealed her natural kinks and curls on national television.

After the unveiling, the news program – in an I-can’t-believe-they’re-actually-doing-this move – polled its audience regarding whether Hall, 43, should stick with her natural look on-air.

Somewhat surprisingly and thankfully – given white America’s well-documented resistance to African-American women who buck conventional beauty ideals – 70 percent of viewers who tweeted in response said that Hall’s tightly curled style was a winner.

For many Black women – even for those for whom unprocessed hair is no longer anything novel – her choice, and the reaction to it, do matter.

Why is that, when it’s 2014 and Black women all over the country have been going natural for years and talking ad nauseam among themselves about whether to go natural, how to go natural and their go-to natural products?

When this approach to hair care is so ubiquitous that it’s been deemed a “revolution,” how is it that this is relevant, when Hall is seemingly so late to the natural-hair game?

Well, because in America, Black hair has been and remains highly political. It has been used as a yardstick, for Blacks and whites alike, to measure beauty, respectability and worth.

Just last week, BuzzFeed released a polarizing yet provocative video, “If Black People Said the Stuff White People Say.” In one of the most poignant scenes, a Black woman with natural hair looks at a white woman in dumbfounded disbelief, saying: “Your hair is amazing. You know it’s kind of like my golden retriever. So limp and lifeless, like, how do you do that?”  Thus illustrating an all-too-familiar ignorant line of dialogue that African-American women encounter when engaging with non-Black acquaintances or navigating predominantly white workspaces.

Read more at newpittsburgcourieronline.com

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top