NBA Finals: Spurs Ambush Heat Early, Take 2-1 Series Lead

hi-res-170254026_crop_north

Hardly anyone — any rational person — could have expected what the San Antonio Spurs did to the two-time defending champion Miami Heat in Game 3 of the NBA Finals on Tuesday night.

Not the Spurs. “We won’t ever shoot 75 percent in a half again,” San Antonio coach Gregg Popovich said.

Not the Heat: “They had us on our heels from the beginning,” Miami’s LeBron James said. “This is something that at this point in the season shouldn’t happen.”

And yet, it did happen — a 41-point first quarter barrage that led to a 25-point lead by halftime and a stunning 111-92 victory that moved the Spurs into a 2-1 series advantage. It also firmly placed the pressure on the Heat to win Game 4 on Thursday in Miami.
It will take a considerably more effective defensive effort and more efficient play on offense to reverse the Game 3 results. Miami watched seemingly helplessly as the Spurs made 12 of their first 14 shots en route to the 41-point first quarter. Spurs forward Kawhi Leonard, who was ineffective in the first two games, broke out with 29 points. And his defense on James (22 points) was admirable.

Overall, the Spurs executed their offense to near perfection much of the night.

“It was fun to watch, and it was one of those games where it happens once in a while,” said Spurs’ sixth man Manu Ginobili, who finished with 11 points.

Dwyane Wade had 22 points and Rashard Lewis 16, but the rest of the Heat players were nullified. Mario Chalmers did not score. Chris Bosh only had nine points. The team tried to rally and cut the Spurs’ lead to under 10 points late in the third quarter, sparking hope.

But the energy expended to get that close weighed on Miami, and San Antonio continued to function at prime level.

 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top